|
Thread: Take your IQ test | This thread is pages long: 1 2 · «PREV |
|
DonGio
Promising
Famous Hero
of Clear Water Mountain Clan
|
posted March 30, 2004 07:18 PM |
|
|
Hm...
I got 145...
But it was an annoying test. I don't know how many ounces there are in a pound! Damn your American measurements. Can't keep nothing simple either, what is it, 12 inches per foot??
Guess dividing things into tens and hundreds would be too boring, huh?
Dixi
DonGio
____________
There are 10 types of people: Those who read binary, and those who don't.
|
|
Svarog
Honorable
Supreme Hero
statue-loving necrophiliac
|
posted March 30, 2004 08:40 PM |
|
|
I can see there’s a lot of confusion of terminology here. (probably mostly because i’m a non-native speaker. Sorry.)
Quote: Properties like the transitive, Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens are relations that implies something from previous propositions, not that guarantees equivalence between two propositions.
Quite true, Athuimus. And they are always correct. These are conclusions that are always true, and the only legitimate ones we can use. (we call them taftologies.)
The example provided, however, is not the case. What you are arguing about is that the statement can be false/true. It is obvious though, as can be seen from the table. But the very essence of drawing that conclusion is a wrong one. You can NEVER draw that kind of conclusion. Therefore, it is a false conclusion, i.e. the whole statement is false. (i don’t know why you call it undetermined. I have never read this term in logic books, with the meaning you say it has. But nevermind, it’s a defference in terminology, as i said. )
If a statement is always false, here we call it contrdiction. (e.g. “p AND non-p”)
Quote: That is not an if-then relation, it is a inference. An if-then relation is p->q. And the statement is a imply, so you only consider in the table the case that the first sentence( (p->q)^(q->r) ) is true.
Difference in terminoly again:
“=>” same with “->” same with “imlication” same with “imply” same with “if-then relation”. You and i talk about the same things. Lol.
But about the letter part concerning the table, you are wrong. In order to prove that a statement is false/true, you need to look at ALL the possible cases, not just the true values of the condition. Test the Transitive Property, Modus Ponens and Modus Tolens statements for all the possible cases, and you’ll see that they are always true, which makes them valid conclusions, unlike the example with the zippers.
Here, i did it for you, about the transitive property. Try the others yourself. “(p=>q) AND non-q => non-p” and “(p=>q) AND p => q”. can’t remember which one was which.
(p=>q) AND (q=>r) => (p=>r)
p q r p=>q - q=>r - p=>r - (p=>q)AND(q=>r) -- ALL
T T T - T --- T --- T --------- T ----------- T
T F T - F --- T --- T --------- F ----------- T
T T F - T --- F --- F --------- F ----------- T
F T T - T --- T --- T --------- T ----------- T
F T F - T --- F --- T --------- F ----------- T
F F T - T --- T --- T --------- T ----------- T
T F F - F --- T --- F --------- F ----------- T
F F F - T --- T --- T --------- T ----------- T
____________
The meek shall inherit the earth, but NOT its mineral rights.
|
|
Athimus_Phaeni
Famous Hero
Final Fantasy Fan
|
posted March 30, 2004 10:43 PM |
|
|
Quote: Difference in terminoly again:
“=>” same with “->” same with “imlication” same with “imply” same with “if-then relation”. You and i talk about the same things. Lol.
An "implication" is an "if-then relation" that is always true.
So when you are testing and "implication" you always tests the "if" part as being true, and certificates that the "then" part is never false, what would invalidate the "always true" property.
Quote: (i don’t know why you call it undetermined. I have never read this term in logic books, with the meaning you say it has. But nevermind, it’s a defference in terminology, as i said.
True, there is no undetermined in logic. But there is when you compare two results, or evaluate a expression of variables.
As you said, being a non-native english speaker is hard when you are writing this kind of posts. There are lots of terms that I don't know the translation.
____________
But I won't be
Burned by the reflection
Of the fire in your eyes
As you're starying at the sun
|
|
Celfious
Promising
Legendary Hero
From earth
|
posted March 31, 2004 08:34 AM |
|
|
all white things are bright colors
This dose not mean all bright colors are white things.
Same goes for
ALl zoops are zeeps.
That dosnt mean all Zeeps are zoops.
There is, undetermined in logic btw.
As you can see there are 3 sections, each numbered.
Section one states that no things that are zips are not zoops. Equivalently said "All aips are Zoops.
Section 2 states all things that are zoops, are zeeps.
When you combine the 2 facts, you are looking at section 3
There could be zeeps that arent zoops or zips.
And Or perhaps all Zeeps are zoops, or all Zeeps are zoops and zips. or some zoops are zips and zoops, while some are merely zoops.
undetermined
Not arrogant**
My friends, this is undetermined. This is AAA-4
Logic teachers can say undetermined or flat out invalid. I stood up to my philosophy teacher and i was right each time, hes mad and he might have quit, which is why i let the education system continue like this in m life.
its undetermined because some cases it can be true or false. Yet by logic undetermined/invalid logicly.
____________
What are you up to
|
|
bjorn190
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Jebus maker
|
posted March 31, 2004 09:46 AM |
|
|
Logic is merely a way to simplify the complexity of the real world - to help the feebleminded
|
|
Celfious
Promising
Legendary Hero
From earth
|
posted March 31, 2004 11:48 AM |
|
|
Number 1: can a mod redo this thread?
2: I have found this wierd IQ test.
Intelligencetest.com
See if you find anything strange about it.
If u dont, then im scared. Cuz i got 133 without reading it but the letters look vuagly different. I dont know if im pshycic Im serious!
Your age adjusted IQ score is 133
The average score is 100 and you scored in the 99th percentile.
____________
What are you up to
|
|
Dingo
Responsible
Legendary Hero
God of Dark SPAM
|
posted August 04, 2004 09:27 AM |
|
|
I got a 135.
____________
The Above Post/Thread/Idea Is CopyRighted by, The Dingo Corp.
|
|
Pirahna
Famous Hero
or not ...
|
posted August 06, 2004 11:20 PM |
|
|
Ok ... i took it again ...
and it said :
Your IQ is: 182
And they sent me a message (again)... if you don't believe me i'll forward you the mail ...
____________
The Pirahna - wow guys ... my posts keep decreasing ... lol ... i can't post
|
|
TheRealDeal
Promising
Supreme Hero
Foobum* of Justice!
|
posted August 08, 2004 07:29 PM |
|
|
136. It was mostly math, but i also took my time.
____________
*We all know the that Foobum is the class of all that is Cake.
|
|
|