|
| Thread: Hit and run |  This thread is pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 · «PREV |
|
sag
Promising
Supreme Hero
WCL owner
|
posted May 05, 2007 08:56 AM |
|
|
team, i would like to know your opinion about the following situation:
player #1 cast offensive spell (e.g. Implosion), however his opponent RESIST the spell 
questions:
- is it considered "a cast"?
- may player #1 retreat if there was rule "no hit'n'run" e.g. with following description "if player cast offensive spell he must give turn to his opponent"?
IMHO it's not h'n'r - cause there was no damage made - and i would suggest to change description to "if player successfully cast offensive spell he must give turn to his opponent"
|
|
maretti
Responsible
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted May 05, 2007 02:30 PM |
|
|
I agree.
____________
Crag rules, Orrin and Ivor suck
|
|
Binabik
Responsible
Legendary Hero
|
|
posted May 06, 2007 11:40 AM |
|
|
The evolution of the lawyer. Make a bunch of rules that nobody agrees on what they mean. Then pay the lawyers a bunch of money to argue that your interpretation of the rules is right and the other guy's is wrong. Whoever hires the most expensive lawyer wins.
If I park my main two steps from the opponent's castle and he can afford to hire 20 heroes to H&R me, then he played better than I did. After the 2nd or 3rd time, I'd ask if he has enough gold to kill me. If he answers yes, I'd concede him the win and say gg, wanna play again tomorrow?
|
|
mvassilev
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted May 06, 2007 06:40 PM |
|
|
I, personally, prefer to play without any rules in MP. If you let an opponent abuse something like this, get them back the same way next time instead of complaining.
____________
Eccentric Opinion
|
|
Devangle1984
Known Hero
I am the Dark Vader
|
|
posted May 06, 2007 09:33 PM |
|
|
Its a very tender question sag, there was no harm done, but the intent was to cast and its only fair that the oppenent gets to cast as well, so i would actually say that u should give the oppenent a chance to cast as well.
|
|
Ecoris
Promising
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted May 06, 2007 10:11 PM |
|
|
Well, we don't know whether he just intended to cast Implosion and then retreat. Perhaps he could have won the battle if the spell hadn't been resisted.
____________
|
|
angelito
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
proud father of a princess
|
|
posted May 06, 2007 10:52 PM |
|
|
Where is the "hit"?
____________
Better judged by 12 than carried by 6.
|
|
SwampLord
Supreme Hero
Lord of the Swamp
|
|
posted May 06, 2007 11:47 PM |
|
|
|
I'd agree with Devangle, he intended to hit you with the spell. However, I prefer also to play without rules, since the spells and tactics benefit both sides.
|
|
Colonel_here
Adventuring Hero
Descendant of Ghengis Khan
|
|
posted May 07, 2007 12:35 AM |
|
|
Since there was an intent to attack therefore I think it should be considered a hit. The fact that damage was not done is to the benefit of the Player #2. However Player #1 did attack just because it failed doesn't mean it did not happen. So the situation is hit and run.
____________
"The job of saving the lives of those who are sinking is the task of those who are sinking" - Ostap Bender
"Only a fool fights a battle he knows he can not win" - Ghengiz Khan
|
|
sag
Promising
Supreme Hero
WCL owner
|
|
posted May 07, 2007 08:04 AM |
|
|
Situation was the following: if i cast AND opponent doesn't resist - then i win; if i cast AND opponent resist - then i loose. IMHO "intention to HIT" is not the same as "HIT"...anyway resistance could save opponent from loosing and had me to surrender/retreat. Fortunately in my game opponent haven't resisted 
|
|
Aculias
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Pretty Boy Angel Sacraficer
|
|
posted May 07, 2007 10:10 AM |
|
|
When Maretti agrees everyone listens  .
As long as there is no damage there is no hit & run.
As long as both players can get a lick in the damage dept, there is no hit & run.
I dont care what Rychenroller says.
____________
Dreaming of a Better World
|
|
angelito
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
proud father of a princess
|
|
posted May 07, 2007 01:53 PM |
|
|
Quote:
if i cast AND opponent doesn't resist - then i win; if i cast AND opponent resist - then i loose....
If your whole strategy in a game is based on ONE spell in final battle, you surely deserve to loose...
____________
Better judged by 12 than carried by 6.
|
|
Ecoris
Promising
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted May 07, 2007 02:27 PM |
|
|
loose is the opposite of tight.
lose is the opposte of win.
____________
|
|
maretti
Responsible
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted May 07, 2007 03:45 PM |
|
Edited by maretti at 15:48, 07 May 2007.
|
Binabik, play some multiplayer games and then lets talk again.
Nobody is paid anything here, so I dont really get the point about the laywer.
____________
Crag rules, Orrin and Ivor suck
|
|
|
|
