Heroes of Might and Magic Community
visiting hero! Register | Today's Posts | Games | Search! | FAQ/Rules | AvatarList | MemberList | Profile


Age of Heroes Headlines:  
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
6 Aug 2016: Troubled Heroes VII Expansion Release - read more
26 Apr 2016: Heroes VII XPack - Trial by Fire - Coming out in June! - read more
17 Apr 2016: Global Alternative Creatures MOD for H7 after 1.8 Patch! - read more
7 Mar 2016: Romero launches a Piano Sonata Album Kickstarter! - read more
19 Feb 2016: Heroes 5.5 RC6, Heroes VII patch 1.7 are out! - read more
13 Jan 2016: Horn of the Abyss 1.4 Available for Download! - read more
17 Dec 2015: Heroes 5.5 update, 1.6 out for H7 - read more
23 Nov 2015: H7 1.4 & 1.5 patches Released - read more
31 Oct 2015: First H7 patches are out, End of DoC development - read more
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
[X] Remove Ads
LOGIN:     Username:     Password:         [ Register ]
HOMM1: info forum | HOMM2: info forum | HOMM3: info mods forum | HOMM4: info CTG forum | HOMM5: info mods forum | MMH6: wiki forum | MMH7: wiki forum
Heroes Community > Age of Heroes Coliseum > Thread: ICTC3: The Tower
Thread: ICTC3: The Tower This thread is 2 pages long: 1 2 · «PREV
Card_Ximinez
Card_Ximinez


Famous Hero
no
posted March 25, 2008 10:45 AM

It's ok Spectrum. I corrected it later. Added the heroes and stuff. That's all I had lost. The sudden decline in quality is due to something else.
____________
wtf this still exists

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Momo
Momo


Promising
Famous Hero
posted March 25, 2008 11:38 AM
Edited by Momo at 17:47, 27 Mar 2008.

My review of this faction:

Cohesiveness: 9/10 bunch of birds in the sky; simple and clear. I also like how they make they counter-point for the way too many creatures in HoMM history that are affine to fire. Still, perhaps the creatures are too homogeneous to make it a masterpiece in cohesiveness.

Imagination: 13/15 I'm always hesitant to give a 15/15 for imagination for a race of beastmen - it's not a virgin territory for sure. Still the work is overall good, and thank god you didn't put air dragon as the lvl7 creature (but rather the good old roc we sorely missed in Heroes V). Not quite as happy with the racial skill, which is essentially just another school of magic which (unlike runes and warcries) doesn't even have a peculiar functioning. A second thumb down goes for not even attemtping to describe the buildings.

Back story: 10/10 origins, check, ties to Ashan's storyline, check, campaign described, check, hero biographies, check.

Battle facets: 6/10 uh-oh. I know I'm repeating this to death in my reviews, but it's very important: this faction hasn't a unique enough playstyle that defines it. Something is hinted - the "flying" theme, and the trend to slow down the opponent by freezing him, stunning him or become unreachable with battle dive; the potential for a unique gameplay is there but... it's not developed.

Discretionary: 3/5 liked the theme and the developement of the theme, but I see some effort lacking. I feel the OP could have done much more and didn't for some reason.

Overall: 40/50

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
GenieLord
GenieLord


Honorable
Legendary Hero
posted March 25, 2008 09:17 PM
Edited by GenieLord at 21:17, 25 Mar 2008.

Cohesiveness: 10 / 10

Imagination/creativity/originality/wow factor: 12 / 15

Back story: 9 / 10

Battle facets: 5 / 10 - A serious lack of your own original creature abilities. Most are taken from H5.

Discretionary: 5 / 5 - for nice building names, and a good development of the racial skill.

Overall score: 41

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
sith_of_ziost
sith_of_ziost


Promising
Supreme Hero
Scouting the Multiverse
posted March 25, 2008 09:32 PM

Cohesiveness- 9/10. You're creatures and hero works well in melody. Slightly off when focusing on the Racial.
Wow Factor - 11/15. Nothing really stands out very well. The adaptation of the Avian language really adds to the flavor, but having too many units with those names takes away from its pretige. The Racial wasn't too surprising either.
Back Story - 4/10. It was very simple, with next to nothing in the ways of explanation. The history was short and bland, with not much to go on.
Battle Facettes - 5/10. It seems very monotonous, meaning nothing really gives it a unique gameplay. It has special Lore, but all the other units seem pulled from other existing creatures. Some abilities surprised me, like the Tier 7 units.
Discretionary - 4/5. I was tempted to give you full points, but you just had too little ingenuity. You put effort into it. And that I applaud.

Total Score: 33/50

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Snatch
Snatch


Promising
Known Hero
Proud Kappa
posted March 29, 2008 06:10 PM
Edited by Snatch at 21:20, 31 Mar 2008.

Cohesiveness: 10/10 (all fits well)

Imagination: 12/15 (as far as a cloud faction goes, abilities are rather conservative, but some good ideas)

Back story: 8/10 (very brief, I would appreciate to know what happenend between 48 and 985 and what exactly is the reason that they start war again)

Battle facets: 6/10 (the alternative upgrades offer some variety, but the balancing could be polished a bit, windrider starts with 7 ability-points whereas Heroes 5 heroes always start with only 5, 'gathering of the clouds' is dull, it hampers one of the main magics of its own faction, sky magic is a nice addition but nothing more, you introduce a new layer but don't explain it)

Discretionary: 1/5 (several good approaches but some rework is needed and in my opinion cloudlings are a bit too gruesome for a good race, parasites are fitting better in horror films and dark races)

37/50

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Tobius
Tobius


Adventuring Hero
posted March 31, 2008 09:11 PM
Edited by Tobius at 21:12, 31 Mar 2008.

The Tower

Cohesiveness(4+3)=7 Well, many flying creatures in the sky may fit together, but I miss written compatibility with HoMM in form of more background
Imagination(4+2+3)=9 You tried to find creative ideas (new magic lore), but overall it's quiet conventional (abilities) as my previous speakers already said
Back Story(3+0)=3 You expand on the universe, but your history is - i agree with sith of ziost - next to nothing and more an alibi than a real background
Battle Facets(3+2)=5 The only thing which gives this faction a unique feeling is the flying theme, but there are other factions that really alter the known battle mechanics. Besides your abilities are somehow uninspired

Discretionary: +1 for heroes

Total Score=25

How I graded these:
Cohesiveness (Internal Coherence [1-5]+HoMM Compatibility [1-5])
Imagination (Creativity [1-5]+Innovations [1-5]+Originality[1-5])
Back Story (How well it expands on one of the HoMM universes [1-5]+How interesting it was to me [1-5])
Battle Facets (Variety [1-5]+Inventive Aspects [1-5])
Discretionary (Bonus for exceptional efforts[1-5])

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
friendofgunnar
friendofgunnar


Honorable
Legendary Hero
able to speed up time
posted April 12, 2008 07:04 AM


The Tower:

FriendofGunnar

cohesiveness 10/10
originality 13/15 it's disappointing to see a roc at the top of such an interesting faction.
backstory 6/10
battle facets 7/10
discretionary 3/5

39


Kookastar

Cohesiveness: 9 points
Imagination/creativity/originality/wow factor: 11 points
Back story: 7 points
Battle facets: 6 points - so many fliers would be a battlefield unevenness.  How would the "cloud terrain" be for the other factions?
Discretionary: 3 points
Total 36


TDL

Cohesiveness(max 10) : 6
Creativity (max 10): 10
Backstory (max 10): 7
Battle Facets (max 15): 9
additional (max 5): 1

windrider hero illogical, sky magic interesting but plain, much less than expected from an avian race… would not work in homm

Total (max 50):33


Guest Judge's Score : 35.20 (Judges grades are weighed differently depending on how many factions they graded)
Judges Score: (39 + 36 + 33) / 3 = 36.00

Final Score: 35.60

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Jump To: « Prev Thread . . . Next Thread » This thread is 2 pages long: 1 2 · «PREV
Post New Poll    Post New Topic    Post New Reply

Page compiled in 0.0346 seconds