|
|
EvilNuff
Adventuring Hero
|
posted November 05, 2013 06:10 AM |
|
|
DoubleDeck said: ...
@Nameless & EvilNuff: Sorry dudes, I think the "must have" cards for winning are becoming boring, soulreaver...wow, forbidden flame...wow what skill...seeing the same heroes, Dhamira, Ishuma, Sandal, Cass...
...
Amusingly from your list, IMO, soul reaver and FF while strong aren't even components of the best decks out there. Those + crag hack are IMO, however, the top 5 heroes at the moment. (I put Dhamiria a pretty distant 5th of that group though.)
|
|
NamelessOrder
Famous Hero
|
posted November 05, 2013 07:40 AM |
|
|
I'd Add Ammar and Adar and CLOSE the list. Honorable mention to Zardoc and Akane (Academy, did you really ask??? xD).
____________
Uplay: ZergRusher | H6: Thoughts on duels | DoC: Cassa
|
|
Dave_Jame
Promising
Legendary Hero
I'm Faceless, not Brainless.
|
posted November 05, 2013 08:32 AM |
|
|
@DD
Quote: Battle trance = 2 cost
Time of need = 7 cost
How did you manange this on turn 3?
Fallow me
Round 2(3) you have 3 resources and 2-2-2 states
First: Play Gold pile -> 4 resources
Second: Play Battle trance for 2 -> Put Time of need on top of your deck
Third: Play Alter of Whishe for 2 -> If the you meet the requirements of the top card of your deck, play it fo free (Which is 2-2-2 for time of need and we have that)
Forth: Play time of need for free -> Chose any unique card in your deck and play it for free.
Sixth: Chose and play Shi-no-shi for free -> wath the WTF face and rage of your oponent.
|
|
The_Polyglot
Promising
Supreme Hero
channeling capybara energy
|
posted November 05, 2013 09:32 AM |
|
|
@Nameless: I'm itching to try trollgate, miss the cards for it.(both gates and fatties)
____________
Friend-shaped
|
|
Dave_Jame
Promising
Legendary Hero
I'm Faceless, not Brainless.
|
posted November 05, 2013 09:33 AM |
|
|
NamelessOrder said: I'd Add Ammar and Adar and CLOSE the list. Honorable mention to Zardoc and Akane (Academy, did you really ask??? xD).
Actually. All Academy Akane I meet were somehow underwhelming compared to Sandal and Yukiko. But a well made Sactuary Akane is a troll in her own.
|
|
watcher83
Supreme Hero
Child of Malassa
|
posted November 05, 2013 10:42 AM |
|
|
The_Polyglot said: @Nameless: I'm itching to try trollgate, miss the cards for it.(both gates and fatties)
As a sandal player I can tell that a good hand wrecks trollgate but it's fun, better with abyssal lords than worms imo.
Yukiko cannot play as fast as Sandal imo. Academy Akane is a really slow deck.
P.S. Take into account that I'm only 1200 elo so my opinions may not be top notch.
____________
|
|
The_Polyglot
Promising
Supreme Hero
channeling capybara energy
|
posted November 05, 2013 11:01 AM |
|
|
A well-executed Yuki rush can and will be faster than Sandal, done it myself many times. In fact, such a rush deck took me to 1396 ELO.
____________
Friend-shaped
|
|
watcher83
Supreme Hero
Child of Malassa
|
posted November 05, 2013 11:12 AM |
|
|
The_Polyglot said: A well-executed Yuki rush can and will be faster than Sandal, done it myself many times. In fact, such a rush deck took me to 1396 ELO.
Oh well, like I said in the P.S. section, but I have yet to see a deck like yours, all Yukiko players I find (1000-1500 elo) play fortunes not spells.
____________
|
|
DoubleDeck
Promising
Legendary Hero
Look into my eyes...
|
posted November 05, 2013 12:53 PM |
|
|
Dave_Jame said: @DD
Quote: Battle trance = 2 cost
Time of need = 7 cost
How did you manange this on turn 3?
Fallow me
Round 2(3) you have 3 resources and 2-2-2 states
First: Play Gold pile -> 4 resources
Second: Play Battle trance for 2 -> Put Time of need on top of your deck
Third: Play Alter of Whishe for 2 -> If the you meet the requirements of the top card of your deck, play it fo free (Which is 2-2-2 for time of need and we have that)
Forth: Play time of need for free -> Chose any unique card in your deck and play it for free.
Sixth: Chose and play Shi-no-shi for free -> wath the WTF face and rage of your oponent.
Very cool! I must say I hadn't thought of that....it's the fastest combo ever!
It's funny that Altar of wishes is on top in the graveyard....should it not be time of need?
|
|
RedEmperor30
Famous Hero
|
posted November 05, 2013 01:28 PM |
|
|
time of need must be top card, you must have altar in hand to complete sick combo.
|
|
The_Polyglot
Promising
Supreme Hero
channeling capybara energy
|
posted November 05, 2013 02:48 PM |
|
|
Hehe. The fat deck was fun but had too many counters, so I kind of merged the two. Pulled off the combo in turn 4 as first player, had a DA on the field too, with opponent having wasted 2 firebolts on a Sayama Stalker. What's more, his side was empty! Would post the screen, but it's kinda redundant.
____________
Friend-shaped
|
|
EvilNuff
Adventuring Hero
|
posted November 05, 2013 04:35 PM |
|
|
Adar? Really? I haven't even seen a hint of Malik over 180 telo in weeks...I don't consider it more than above average.
|
|
DoubleDeck
Promising
Legendary Hero
Look into my eyes...
|
posted November 06, 2013 06:57 AM |
|
|
RedEmperor30 said: time of need must be top card, you must have altar in hand to complete sick combo.
I know, but in Poly's screenshot, it's the alter that is the top card in graveyard....strange?
|
|
The_Polyglot
Promising
Supreme Hero
channeling capybara energy
|
posted November 06, 2013 10:42 AM |
|
|
Nah, Altar drops after the card You used it for, in my case Time of Need.
____________
Friend-shaped
|
|
DoubleDeck
Promising
Legendary Hero
Look into my eyes...
|
posted November 06, 2013 10:56 AM |
|
|
Okay, still it's the quickest way to get out a Shi-no-Shi!
@EvilNuff: I must say, been trying with Crag Hack in jackpots but cannot get higher than 170-200 telo. Yesterday I was up and down and then ended up 59 telo...damn, I really am not sure why people say Crag is great in jackpots. Ishuma just destroys him. Dhamiria is potent against him.
|
|
NamelessOrder
Famous Hero
|
posted November 06, 2013 11:52 AM |
|
|
@Evil_Nuff
I also noticed that Adar has been underperforming. I guess we can agree that he's the best from Necro.
@DD
There is quite a lot of material on Crag. I guess you should read the guide on official forum (there is lots of new content). Also many streamers play Crag (although sometimes it's hard to figure out if this is a quality streamer).
The author of CH guide made 14 videos from JP playing CH - check this out - http://www.youtube.com/user/mikedoecke?feature=watch.
I don't think that Ishuma or Dhamiria has a big advantage. Just because a hero has a counter to another hero it doesn't mean that it will be able to use it. Look at Malik vs Crag - Malik has FF, fire bolts, fire balls, Wraiths and Spitters and still loses.
____________
Uplay: ZergRusher | H6: Thoughts on duels | DoC: Cassa
|
|
DoubleDeck
Promising
Legendary Hero
Look into my eyes...
|
posted November 06, 2013 12:51 PM |
|
|
Shot, I have read all that, going with 4/0/2 build as recommended, but still finding win/loss rate is 50%. Either WesleyC played against bad players, or he was just lucky. Not sure. But Crag doesn't give you stable win rate...at least I cannot see it.
|
|
RMZ1989
Supreme Hero
|
posted November 06, 2013 01:18 PM |
|
|
DoubleDeck said: Shot, I have read all that, going with 4/0/2 build as recommended, but still finding win/loss rate is 50%. Either WesleyC played against bad players, or he was just lucky. Not sure. But Crag doesn't give you stable win rate...at least I cannot see it.
Last Jackpot I've played, I was 239 TELO with Crag Hack, and didn't have time to play more so I ended up with Tier 2 reward.
He is definitely good, but you have to play him quite a lot so you could learn from your past positioning mistakes etc. And luck is huge factor with Crag, starting hand and enemy hero and their starting hand.
I played Ammar that completely destroyed me, and next one died in 4th turn.
No matter against what hero you are playing, if you start with 2-3 Dark Assassins, and there are 1-2 Mana Storms on enemies turn, there isn't much that he can do, and if you deal a lot of damage earlier in the game, it isn't sure win, but it is a lot easier when you get him in reach of your Paos/Stampedes to finish him off.
@Nameless
Well, Necro is nerfed quite a bit by nerfing Banshees and introducing grave counters while giving them almost nothing in return.
____________
Give a man a mask, and he'll
become his true self.
|
|
RedEmperor30
Famous Hero
|
posted November 06, 2013 01:21 PM |
|
|
RMZ1989 said:
DoubleDeck said: Shot, I have read all that, going with 4/0/2 build as recommended, but still finding win/loss rate is 50%. Either WesleyC played against bad players, or he was just lucky. Not sure. But Crag doesn't give you stable win rate...at least I cannot see it.
Last Jackpot I've played, I was 239 TELO with Crag Hack, and didn't have time to play more so I ended up with Tier 2 reward.
He is definitely good, but you have to play him quite a lot so you could learn from your past positioning mistakes etc. And luck is huge factor with Crag, starting hand and enemy hero and their starting hand.
I played Ammar that completely destroyed me, and next one died in 4th turn.
No matter against what hero you are playing, if you start with 2-3 Dark Assassins, and there are 1-2 Mana Storms on enemies turn, there isn't much that he can do, and if you deal a lot of damage earlier in the game, it isn't sure win, but it is a lot easier when you get him in reach of your Paos/Stampedes to finish him off.
@Nameless
Well, Necro is nerfed quite a bit by nerfing Banshees and introducing grave counters while giving them almost nothing in return.
Flesh was king *sob*
|
|
RMZ1989
Supreme Hero
|
posted November 06, 2013 01:37 PM |
|
|
RedEmperor30 said:
Flesh was king *sob*
Indeed, sad thing is, he just isn't good with the Banshee nerf even with the Incorporeal fix.
I've tried playing him, and it feels almost impossible to play 6-3-4 build, while 6-4-2 has a lot of counters.
Every other Necro hero feels better than him currently, I really can't believe that they nerfed Banshee with 6-3-0 requirement instead of something else...
____________
Give a man a mask, and he'll
become his true self.
|
|
|