|
Thread: Insensitive Americans!?! | This thread is pages long: 1 2 3 · «PREV |
|
Wolfman
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Insomniac
|
posted November 13, 2003 12:23 AM |
|
|
Of course it's not just an american trait, but some non-americans here might not agree.
____________
|
|
privatehudson
Responsible
Legendary Hero
The Ultimate Badass
|
posted November 13, 2003 12:41 AM |
|
|
I think it's safe to say there's a little difference between being silly and being the perpetrator of genocide. The conquistadors were sadists and mass murderers akin to Hitler, not simply a little silly...
____________
We're on an express elevator to Hell, goin' down!
|
|
Wolfman
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Insomniac
|
posted November 13, 2003 12:44 AM |
|
|
<----- This face is a little silly. Killing civilians because they don't agree with you is terrorism. While bin Laden has not commited genocide, he is doing more than being a little silly.
____________
|
|
privatehudson
Responsible
Legendary Hero
The Ultimate Badass
|
posted November 13, 2003 04:02 AM |
|
|
I was just suggesting that the actions of the Conquistadors doesn't quite sit on the same level as that of the Americans laughing at french people. I wasn't referring to your post.
____________
We're on an express elevator to Hell, goin' down!
|
|
Wolfman
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Insomniac
|
posted November 13, 2003 04:05 AM |
|
|
Oh, well this face is still silly ------>
____________
|
|
terje_the_ma...
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
|
posted November 13, 2003 11:41 AM |
|
|
Quote: The Aztecs were sacrificial heathans who tortured their prisoners of war and bathed in their blood. Oh, yes, they were a great and educated people all right. Cortez did the world a favor.
Please note that I added "(or at least their neighbours were)".
I thought of the same thing when typing, and figured that a little spesification was in order.
Actually, some researchers found out that the Aztecs would've exterminated themselves in some 20 years anyway (not that this makes the sacrifice of the slaughter and massacres any better). But their neighbours were, like I said, ok people.
And the Inkas were swell.
Or so I've read...
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.
|
|
Delfontes
Known Hero
Sorcerer Extraordinaire
|
posted November 13, 2003 04:44 PM |
|
|
Quote: some researchers found out that the Aztecs would've exterminated themselves in some 20
What???
Did they find a journal of an Aztec Dr. Evil with his plan of world domination by extermination of everyone that wasn't him?
I don't care how big of a civil war was in the works, they wouldn't have "exterminated" themselves, the worst would be a halving of the population. A lot of countries have had Civil wars without exterminating themselves, that is just sill.
Show me a link to this research you're talking about, it would seem it is pure BS, sorry.
|
|
terje_the_ma...
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
|
posted November 14, 2003 12:09 PM |
|
|
I think I read it in this popular sientific magazine... And the reason they would've exterminated themselves, was that they used to sacrifice hundreds of thousands of people or more per year.
Since they'd killed off most of their less powerful neighbours, they'd have to start to sacrifice their own.
I think....
My memory ain't too good, so it's VERY probable that I'm wrong.
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.
|
|
|