Quote:

---

Part I: The Greatest Story Ever Told
Horus left and Jesus right
Horus left and Jesus right

Part I evaluates the historicity of the Bible. In furtherance of the Jesus myth hypothesis, this part argues that the historical Jesus is a literary and astrological hybrid,[7] and that the Bible is based on astrological principles documented by many ancient civilizations, especially pertaining to the movement of the sun through the sky and stars. The film explains how and why early civilizations personified the Sun as the "representative of the unseen Creator or God" and how stars were linked into constellations, the 12 constellations being a place of travel for "God's Sun" and representing "elements of nature that happened during that period of time." This section is also used by the film to show the Pagan origins of the symbol of the Cross.

Horus, the Ancient Egyptian Sun God, is introduced as having a number of attributes in common with Jesus. For instance, Horus was born on December 25th of a virgin mother, his arrival was proclaimed by a star in the east and upon his birth he was adored by three kings. He was a child teacher at 12, was baptized at 30, traveled with 12 disciples and performed acts such as healing the sick and walking on water. The relationship between Horus and Set is also discussed. The movie describes this conflict as "one of the most ubiquitous mythological dualities ever known and it's still expressed at many levels at this day."

According to the movie, religion and myths in general can be used to motivate people to be good or remember important astrological occurrences, but ultimately if the majority of people believe in something that is not true, then they are in danger of being controlled or oppressed.

Part II: All the World's a Stage
9/11 attacks
9/11 attacks

Part II of the documentary claims 9/11 was engineered to generate mass fear, justify going to war with Afghanistan and Iraq, to remove civil liberties from the general public, and to make more money for the people in power. These theories include that the United States was warned about the impending September 11, 2001 attacks, that NORAD allowed the planes to reach their targets, and that the World Trade Center buildings underwent a controlled demolition. The film also explores the theory that six of the named hijackers are still alive, that Hani Hanjour could not have flown Flight 77 into the Pentagon, that the Bush Administration covered up the truth in the 9/11 Commission Report, and that the mainstream media has failed to ask important questions about the official account.

Part III: Don't Mind the Men Behind the Curtain
The Federal Reserve
The Federal Reserve

According to Part III, powerful bankers have been conspiring for world domination and increased power while the rich of society have been using their wealth to increase financial panic and foster a consolidation of independent competing banks. The film details the Theory of Electronic Conspiracy and claims that the Federal Reserve System, the central bank of the United States, was created in order to steal the wealth of the nation. It explores war profiteering by banking cartels and defense and military contractors. It describes the goal of these bankers as world power over a controllable public.[8]

This section also explores the possibility that there is a clandestine movement, promoted by the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, to usurp the American constitution and US dollar, by merging the United States, Canada and Mexico into a North American Union that uses a single currency, the Amero, without the ratification of Congress. This currency union would create a super-state similar to the European Union, which together with the African Union and the proposed Asian Union would gradually be merged into a One World government. The movie concludes that under such a government, every human being will be implanted with a RFID microchip which will be used to monitor individuals and suppress dissent. It also claims that the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Federal Income Tax are unconstitutional and there are no laws which state that citizens must pay the tax. The movie ends, however, on an optimistic note, expressing confidence in the possibility of overthrowing oppressive forces and the ultimate triumph of revolution.

---

Quote:

---

1) Isn't the Income Tax Law stated in Title 26 of the IRS code?
Wasn't the 16th Amendment fully ratified? Do I have to pay taxes?

(A) The Income tax is not applicable to the wages of a person for wages paid for a service is Barter and this by all precedent via the supreme court decisions is not "taxable income". There is no statute for the average wage earner to pay taxes; just for corporate gains. (B) Even if there was a law, it would be unconstitutional for you are being forced to be a witness against yourself by the mandatory filing and signing of the return (5th amendment), which is why in the code is says discreetly that the filing is "voluntary", even though it isn't practiced as such. (C) What is codified in Title 26 does not make the average person liable to pay income tax.

In order for there to be taxable domestic income, all of the following
must occur:
1. One must receive a taxable "item" of income such as compensation, interest, rents, etc. (per 26 USC 61 and following).
2. The "source rules" must categorize the income as domestic income (per 26 USC 861(a) and 26 CFR 1.861-2 through 1.861-7).
3. The income must derive from a "specific source or activity"which is taxable (per 26 USC 861(b) and 26 CFR 1.861-8 and following).

(D) As far as the 16th amendment, it was not even remotely close to legal ratification, therefore voiding the whole thing as unconstitutional.

See:
"The Law That Never was" by Bill Benson for more info on the 16th Amendment.

Challenge:
http://livefreenow.org/30K_challenge.cfm

As far as paying taxes, yes, you have to pay taxes... not because you are legally bound to, but because the Establishment Courts ignore the illegality of the issue. There are numerous cases of individuals who have been acquitted on the grounds that the court could not prove the law. However, none of these have been powerful enough to incite public opinion to take a stand. There have been many who have fought the system with a certain degree of success but if you do choose to challenge your personal income taxes, you need to be VERY prepared. We recommend this free Book by Conklin to begin.

---