|
Thread: The Transgender Matrix: It’s Time to Choose the Red Pill | This thread is pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 20 ... 23 24 25 26 27 · «PREV / NEXT» |
|
artu
Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
|
posted May 18, 2021 12:53 AM |
|
Edited by artu at 00:58, 18 May 2021.
|
@blob
You are mixing apples and oranges here, the guy isnt coming up with some unconventional hypothesis. His objection is political. And besides from the scientific consensus, I already explained why it is not a mental delusion on a basic, logical level.
Religion is not under attack when religious people dont try to empose it on law, science, social norms and mind their own business. That seldom happens though!
And of course, Bruno being accused of witchcraft because he opposed the dogma of the Church and actually quoting “prophecy” of witches are entirely different things.
____________
Are you pretty? This is my occasion. - Ghost
|
|
Celfious
Promising
Legendary Hero
From earth
|
posted May 18, 2021 02:37 AM |
|
|
James brown would be rolling in his grave ** if this became a trans world.
____________
What are you up to
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted May 18, 2021 04:16 AM |
|
|
it's a traaaaans world...
but it wouldn't be nothing... NOTHIIIIING...
without someone cutting off their junk...
|
|
NimoStar
Responsible
Legendary Hero
Modding the Unmoddable
|
posted May 18, 2021 05:26 AM |
|
|
Somebody probably has mentioned it but both Matrix creators are trans now
Tho it's not surprising given Matrix 3 "saves" the Matrix and goes against the message of the one (destroy the system vs make a deal with the system to save the system).
____________
|
|
artu
Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
|
posted May 18, 2021 10:28 AM |
|
|
Actually, no. The system as in “humans not knowing they are in the Matrix” wasnt going to continue. It’s just that people didnt wipe out machines as it would be in a typical Hollywood ending. And although I dont like the trilogy very much, that part was at least original.
It is, of course, still ironic using a metaphor created by trans women directors to claim trans people are mentally deluded.
____________
Are you pretty? This is my occasion. - Ghost
|
|
Minion
Legendary Hero
|
posted May 18, 2021 11:09 AM |
|
|
Come on, they can't be happy and functioning people of the society! That shatters everything Stevie and Gandalf believe in!
Funny though, these filmmakers are just enjoying their life, but were it up to Gandalf they would be locked away somewhere in an insane asylum.
Reminds me of V for Vendetta actually, incidentally an adaptation written by the same trans women.
____________
"These friends probably started using condoms after having produced the most optimum amount of offsprings. Kudos to them for showing at least some restraint" - Tsar-ivor
|
|
Baronus
Legendary Hero
|
posted May 18, 2021 11:42 AM |
|
|
Its so stupid ideology that is imposible to discuss. They talking about 666 genders absolutly serious! Completly madness. Ill people...
And if see that is 2 genders YOU ARE NOT RELIGIOUS MAN! You are only a normal man in this theme.
I know that for these mads its a religion but not for a normal people. Its only simply observation.
|
|
Skeggy
Promising
Famous Hero
|
posted May 18, 2021 11:50 AM |
|
|
Well, there should be some extra information like xm or xf because of the obvious comparative superiority in chess and snow.
So, you know, we can calculate respectfully specific standard deviations and then subtract that from respectfully observed specific results.
But, you know, this question is a little bit specific because it could just happen that you were a happy budding female fetus that just absorbed your fetus bro, thusly making him a part of your DNA. Otherwise could be true as well, just check this article.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/
There are, of course, two more variations, a female fetus absorbs another female fetus and respectively, a male fetus absorbs another male fetus.
So, you know, we should all check our snow and we should all do it, you know, planetary.
We should also include that extra information on our personal identification documents.
So, this is a proposal for a new sex classification:
FF (female that absorbed female)
MM (male that absorbed male)
FM (female that absorbed male)
MF (male that absorbed female)
F (standard female)
M (standard male)
X prefix for eventual sex change
We should also calculate standard deviations for all variants respectfully against standard F and M results.
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted May 18, 2021 12:46 PM |
|
|
scientificamerican is sheer left-wing trash. one quick perusal of their topics and minimal reading would tell you this if you had any sense.
|
|
Corribus
Hero of Order
The Abyss Staring Back at You
|
posted May 18, 2021 02:51 PM |
|
|
Scientific American is a popular science magazine with articles predominantly written by front line scientists, not reporters. It's about as reliable on a technical level as you can get without going to the peer reviewed literature.
____________
I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask them where they're goin', and hook up with them later. -Mitch Hedberg
|
|
Gandalf196
Disgraceful
Supreme Hero
|
posted May 18, 2021 02:59 PM |
|
|
|
Kipshasz
Undefeatable Hero
Elvin's Darkside
|
posted May 18, 2021 03:05 PM |
|
|
Depends. And Washington Compost is crap.
in the instances if the peers doing the reviews are semi literate and one of the cons of the paper's technical details(to the uneducated lot, meaning how it's written, what citation system is used and so forth, down to the font used and line gaps) according to them is "complex sentence structure", I can agree it's bull, but not in other instances.
In my field, peer review prevents pseudohistory crap being pushed as legit stuff.
____________
"Kip is the Gavin McInnes of HC" - Salamandre
"Ashan to the Trashcan", "I got PTSD from H7. " - LizardWarrior
|
|
Salamandre
Admirable
Omnipresent Hero
Wog refugee
|
posted May 18, 2021 03:07 PM |
|
|
The final conclusion of that article (Scientific American) has nothing to do with science, but only with political correctness and the knelling to confused individuals, which I think fred is right to point out.
"My feeling is that since there is not one biological parameter that takes over every other parameter, at the end of the day, gender identity seems to be the most reasonable parameter,” says Vilain. In other words, if you want to know whether someone is male or female, it may be best just to ask."
____________
Era II mods and utilities
|
|
Lith-Maethor
Honorable
Legendary Hero
paid in Coin and Cleavage
|
posted May 18, 2021 03:08 PM |
|
|
Heh...
Gandalf196 said: I think that the fact that science has become a career and even an industry to be detrimental.
I don't disagree but find me another way for scientists to survive the way things work.
____________
You are suffering from delusions of adequacy.
|
|
artu
Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
|
posted May 18, 2021 03:20 PM |
|
Edited by artu at 15:24, 18 May 2021.
|
Peer review system is the insurance of personal bias or economic interest.
And it’s not like you guys are objecting because you are neurologists or biologists with an alternative hypothesis.
@Sal
It can be very well his honest opinion, you have no way of knowing he’s kneeling to ahything and what he says is reasonable. If you got nothing against transgender people, but the politics as you claim, why does his conclusion bother you? There’s nothing political about it.
____________
Are you pretty? This is my occasion. - Ghost
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted May 18, 2021 03:20 PM |
|
|
Corribus said: Scientific American is a popular science magazine with articles predominantly written by front line scientists, not reporters. It's about as reliable on a technical level as you can get without going to the peer reviewed literature.
you show me scientists who aren't worried about losing their jobs or being ostracized by the people pushing nonsense and their brainwashed flock, or who won't take money to promote something, and i'll take your word for it.
not until then.
to add to that, just because YOU don't see any issue with their topics or content, doesn't mean that everything they print is genuine or not driven by some agenda. just a cursory glance at the topics on that site can tell you that neither of the latter are true.
|
|
Salamandre
Admirable
Omnipresent Hero
Wog refugee
|
posted May 18, 2021 03:32 PM |
|
|
artu said: why does his conclusion bother you? There’s nothing political about it.
It does not bother as opinion, but as scientific fact, in a so called scientific top article, which it isn't at all. If is about how someone feels, what about I park my car on handicapped place, then, despite I look full healthy, I say I feel I have no hands. What if I go in girls changing-room because I identify as 12 yo girl that day? How you untangle then my trick if all I have to say is "I feel offended" to shut you.
There is as much science in gender identity as in examples above. All is about being nice people, I get it. It is both political and about survival, the cancel culture gets more and more the upper hand on. In such conditions, is hard to genuinely believe in objectivity.
|
|
artu
Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
|
posted May 18, 2021 03:36 PM |
|
Edited by artu at 15:36, 18 May 2021.
|
Well, it is rather a rethorical use of the word “feel” when you look at the context. He is talking about biological parameters, not political correctness.
____________
Are you pretty? This is my occasion. - Ghost
|
|
Salamandre
Admirable
Omnipresent Hero
Wog refugee
|
posted May 18, 2021 03:40 PM |
|
|
Asking someone's gender doesn't necessarily gets the correct answer.
Such is not a scientific way, that's my point.
|
|
Ghost
Undefeatable Hero
Therefore I am
|
posted May 18, 2021 03:42 PM |
|
|
I want to say hermaphrodite, man and woman are normal. Psychologist doctor woman said to me! She said only those are normal. She knows too much about the Bible, plants and animals. She is ex-believer, but her education caused annul all. No talking more!
Remember what? 1960's started all. Example of LGBT came. So science takes change again. Why? A new argument. Science own way. They are looking for the answer.
|
|
|