|
| Thread: Conspiracy theories |  This thread is pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 · «PREV / NEXT» |
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted December 03, 2022 08:42 PM |
|
|
Yeah, but it makes no sense. Things are what they are, not what people feel they might be. Otherwise no one would ever be at fault for anything. Which wouldn't fit the jewish narrative - or anyone else's, for that matter.
You aren't a Jew just because you feel like one. Just as you aren't a Catholic just because you feel like one. Or a Palestinian. Or a dog.
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 04, 2022 01:05 PM |
|
|
artu said:
Nothing in my link proves what you are saying because what you are saying is clinical level paranoia and the reason you dont get that is exactly because you are clinical. The Jews are not eradicating white people, immigration trends have nothing to do with a country being "white," whatever you imagine that means.
you say this while at the same time not bothering to understand the information in the link you posted; completely ignoring both what i told you to do, so you could LEARN, and continuing without addressing ANYTHING i've said with ANY FACTS to back the bullsnow you're spewing UP. continually, you just ignore what i'm saying, ignore the info in the links YOU POST, and call me names like that's a suitable argument for an adult. and not even that, but calling me something i just posted a link to, pointing out how JEWS have a predisposition for schizophrenia(and it's from a JEWISH MEDIA WEBSITE). but sure, call me paranoid while completely ignoring both valid points, and every shred of information i DIDN'T create THAT BOTH EXPLAINS AND VALIDATES WHAT I'M SAYING.
is THAT THE BEST YOU CAN DO? is that ALL you can do? be someone who argues with himself, post links that validate MY points, and call people names that apply to the people i'm talking about???
you know what? i'm not even going to READ the rest of your horsesnow. if you cannot even counter ONE POINT i've made by ACTUALLY REFUTING it, then just stop responding to me. you are an entire waste of the ONE post i get a day.
do you understand? you haven't refuted ONE point i'm made. NOT ONE. all you can do is kvetch and whine, call names like a child, argue with yourself, and be OBLIVIOUS TO EVERY BIT OF IT.
do you KNOW why you CAN'T prove me wrong? why you CANNOT find proof that argues in YOUR favor?
because i'm RIGHT. and OBVIOUSLY SO. if you put the amount of time in your life that you spend WASTING MINE, you could have already found out that i was NOT WRONG. about ANY of it. but actually using your brain would make you "anti-semitic". a catchphrase designed to nullify dissent; just like the term "conspiracy theory", created by the snowing CIA. god, you people are DENSE.
now here's where you make another dismissive remark/post and REMAIN dense and uninformed(all on your own), and then ERRONEOUSLY go on believing PROVABLY INCORRECT HORSEsnow. like people like you ALWAYS DO.
|
|
artu
Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
|
|
posted December 04, 2022 02:05 PM |
|
Edited by artu at 14:11, 04 Dec 2022.
|
Yes, fred, somehow, you are so obviously right according to nobody but only you. If that doesnt tip you on your own mental state, I guess nothing can.
I'm not a magician and I can not change how your delusional will bends every data into how you wish to see them. A very simple example: Your latest link doesnt claim "Jews have a predisposition to schizophrenia." What it actually says is, Ashkenazi Jews have a gene that boosts the chance of schizophrenia by 40 percent. So, if the overall chance of being schizophrenic is, say, 3 percent, that 3 percent probability gets a 40 percent boost. And had your link indeed claimed Jews had a predisposition to schizophrenia, how could that have been proof of them ruling the world? Schizophrenic people cant even organize their own lives, most of them live under special care or with their parents.
And it's just the same with rest of your claims. I know you sincerely believe you havent been refuted but that's because you are so lost, you cant even see the sentences that refute you. They fly right by you. So I would be extremely glad if you dont "waste" your single post a day on me. After all, it was you who got offended by a generic sarcasm, a fictional conspiracy about HC meant for fun and once again tried to prove how your ramblings are so very real. I didnt ask for that.
Oh, by the the way, CIA exists since 1947, the phrase is much older:
"Conspiracy theory: Explanation of an event or situation involving unwarranted belief that it is caused by a conspiracy among powerful forces" emerged in mid-20c. (by 1937) and figures in the writings of, or about, Charles Beard, Hofstadter, Veblen, etc., but the degree of paranoia and unreasonableness implied in each use is not always easy to discern. The phrase was used from 19c. in a non-pejorative sense "the theory that a (certain) conspiracy exists," especially in court cases. Its use in general reference to theories of hidden cabals pulling wires behind the scenes of national or global events is by 1871."
____________
Are you pretty? This is my occasion. - Ghost
|
|
yogi
Promising
Famous Hero
of picnics
|
|
posted December 05, 2022 02:14 PM |
|
|
JollyJoker said:
You aren't a Jew just because you feel like one. Just as you aren't a Catholic just because you feel like one. Or a Palestinian. Or a dog.
how about a "woman"?
____________
yogi - class: monk | status: healthy
"Lol we are HC'ers.. The same tribe.. Guy!" ~Ghost
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 05, 2022 09:46 PM |
|
|
|
artu
Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
|
|
posted December 06, 2022 12:49 AM |
|
|
Being ethnically Jewish isnt "imagining" to be Jewish though. Religion as culture and tradition cant be reduced to faith. And the tradition itself wasnt expansionist, it valued maternal bloodline.
@ Yogi
If you are referring to trans people, some actually have the hormonal and neurological wiring of a gender not in sequence with their anatomy. The biological aspect is complicated. But you also have people who get carried away and think of it as some counter-culture or whatever... Those are all rare examples though, cant be compared to people who dont believe in the cosmology presented by religions but embrace it as family tradition or cultural heritage, that's much more common and normative.
____________
Are you pretty? This is my occasion. - Ghost
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 06, 2022 06:42 AM |
|
|
It's still silly. Because the reason behind all that "family tradition" and "cultural heritage" is RELIGION. So people who don't believe in that religion but keep to "family tradition and cultural heritage" anyway are pretty irrational because they embrace something which is the result of something they don't believe in.
It's like, "We have a 2500 year old history as a people since we were the first ones who believed in one god only and that we were His chosen people. Our whole culture is centered around that belief and we were persecuted throughout history because of that. I don't believe in God, chosen people and all that, but it has made us something special and I embrace that."
You realize how completely nuts that is, right?
|
|
Drakon-Deus
Undefeatable Hero
Nixonite
|
|
posted December 06, 2022 06:51 AM |
|
|
JollyJoker said:
It's like, "We have a 2500 year old history as a people since we were the first ones who believed in one god only and that we were His chosen people. Our whole culture is centered around that belief and we were persecuted throughout history because of that. I don't believe in God, chosen people and all that, but it has made us something special and I embrace that."
You realize how completely nuts that is, right?
I do not. It's not completely unreasonable to me. I see your point and it all may be silly, but not nuts.
____________
Horses don't die on a dog's wish.
|
|
Gnomes2169
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Duke of the Glade
|
|
posted December 06, 2022 07:53 AM |
|
|
It's almost like human beings aren't supremely rational logic machines and do and believe in stupid things all the time, JJ. And yes, they may be wrong to do it, but that doesn't mean that you're right according to legal classifications or definitions either. Just because you're right doesn't make you correct.
Get meme'd, nerd. 
____________
Yeah in the 18th century, two inventions suggested a method of measurement. One won and the other stayed in America.
-Ghost destroying Fred
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 06, 2022 08:45 AM |
|
|
Tell me about it.
I mean, I don't believe in the Christian God or Jesus our Savior, but I've had a Catholic childhood and because of that I'm part of a 2000 year old culture that I fully embrace. You know, Christmas and gifts, I really like that. Great stuff. Also - churches. I mean, who doesn't like to visit a cathedral and be really awed about it? Sure, it's a bit like the Pyramids, they are monuments of vanity and hubris, but it's all part of the heritage, isn't it?
Yep, come to think of it, I really feel like a Christian. Since there are so many, it may not be such an elitist and exclusive heritage like the Jewish, but I've been rather restless in my early days and been moving a lot, I'm sure, if I dig a bit I'll find me some gypsies in my ancestry, that will be elitist enough. Always felt like one anyway.
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 06, 2022 01:39 PM |
|
|
artu said:
Oh, by the the way, CIA exists since 1947, the phrase is much older:
"Conspiracy theory: Explanation of an event or situation involving unwarranted belief that it is caused by a conspiracy among powerful forces" emerged in mid-20c. (by 1937) and figures in the writings of, or about, Charles Beard, Hofstadter, Veblen, etc., but the degree of paranoia and unreasonableness implied in each use is not always easy to discern. The phrase was used from 19c. in a non-pejorative sense "the theory that a (certain) conspiracy exists," especially in court cases. Its use in general reference to theories of hidden cabals pulling wires behind the scenes of national or global events is by 1871."
like i told you in hcm, thanks for actually teaching me something. i appreciate that you put actual effort into a post, instead of just arguing without any frame of reference whatsoever but just to state: "nuh-uh, you're wrong."
now, with that said, allow me to teach you something:
the person credited with the creation of the term "conspiracy theory" is a one charles bristed, who supposedly coined the term in 1863 in a letter to the new york times; regarding Uk's involvement in the american civil war:
[img]Bristed made the earliest known use of the term "conspiracy theory," in a letter to the editor published in The New York Times on January 11, 1863.[3] He used it to refer to claims that British aristocrats were intentionally weakening the United States during the American Civil War in order to advance their financial interests.[/img]
now, if you actually check out that claim, you will find he was correct:
Quote:
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland remained officially neutral throughout the American Civil War (1861–1865). It legally recognised the belligerent status of the Confederate States of America (CSA) but never recognised it as a nation and neither signed a treaty with it nor ever exchanged ambassadors. Over 90 percent of Confederate trade with Britain ended, causing a severe shortage of cotton by 1862. Private British blockade runners sent munitions and luxuries to Confederate ports in return for cotton and tobacco.
British trade with the Confederacy fell over 90% from the prewar period, with a small amount of cotton going to Britain and some munitions and luxury goods slipped in by numerous small blockade runners. They were operated and funded by British private interests. They were legal under international law and caused no dispute between the US and Britain.[3]
A long-term issue was sales of warships to the Confederacy. A British shipyard (John Laird and Sons) built two warships for the Confederacy, including the CSS Alabama,[5] over vehement protests from the US. Known as the Alabama Claims, the controversy was resolved peacefully after the Civil War when the US was awarded $15.5 million in arbitration by an international tribunal for damages caused by the warships.
and with that, you now know that the VERY FIRST CONSPIRACY "THEORY", WAS NOT JUST A THEORY, but FACT.
now, on to the meat of the subject:
Quote:
A conspiracy theory is an explanation for an event or situation that invokes a conspiracy by sinister and powerful groups, often political in motivation,[3][4][5] when other explanations are more probable.[3][6][7] The term has a negative connotation, implying that the appeal to a conspiracy is based on prejudice or insufficient evidence.[8] A conspiracy theory is not the same as a conspiracy; instead, it refers to a hypothesized conspiracy with specific characteristics, such as an opposition to the mainstream consensus among those people (such as scientists or historians) who are qualified to evaluate its accuracy
"when other explanations are more probable". tell me, artu, when you see massive amounts of evidence (which you don't; because you've shut yourself off to the idea that anything i say could ever be correct), do you utterly discredit it, simply because a simpler answer is easier to accept? you don't need to answer that; i already know the answer.
now let's look at the words "the appeal to a conspiracy is based on prejudice or insufficient evidence". first off, prejudice is defined as:
Quote:
1. The act or state of holding unreasonable preconceived judgments or convictions.
2. An adverse judgment or opinion formed unfairly or without knowledge of the facts.
3. Irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular social group, such as a race or the adherents of a religion.
(1) and (2) state that prejudice is based on a lack of reason, without knowledge of the facts. which, i agree. take somebody who's racist without knowledge, without ever having actually DEALT with, or knowing of ANY facts regarding the people they're racist against. in that case, they are certainly prejudiced, and would be in accordance with (3).
but if someone, say, a white, pays attention to the overwhelming racial statistics of black on white crime, they will be REASONABLY of the opinion that blacks commit overwhelming numbers of crimes against whites, and are therefore a people to be cautious of. even moreso, when you know the EXACT DEMOGRAPHIC that is causing the majority of those crimes, and respond to THAT group accordingly.
which means, that a person like that is not acting out of PREJUDICE, because their understanding of the matter is based on FACT. it cannot be a "theory", when there is overwhelming evidence of said "theory".
i hope you're getting the gist of where i'm going with this.
but anyway, on to the claim that a conspiracy theory is based on "insufficient evidence". this is vitally important, artu. THERE IS OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that jews act, and do, exactly as i have described. so where exactly is the "insufficient evidence" of a tinfoil hat "conspiracy theory"? if you have hundreds, if not thousands, of incidences of evidence, pointing to ONE PRIMARY ENTITY being responsible for events in the world, is that still "insufficient evidence"?
no. of COURSE it's not.
you CLAIM that the people responsible for the events of the world are complex and many, and on the surface, sure, you can argue that. it's simpler to just accept popular opinion. but, do a little digging, and you'll find a common denominator amongst the complex.
artu, i've observed jews across EVERY SPECTRUM of society, from EVERY social class, from EVERY medium of media, all acting in accordance with zionist world control/non-jew destruction. if 99.9% of jews and what they say, that i've observed, are almost ENTIRELY geared towards zionist expansion and control while dividing/destroying EVERY NON-JEW's culture, their people, and their countries; then tell me: where does the "insufficient evidence" come into play?
you can OBSERVE what i'm saying. it's in mass media. it's in academics. it's in business. it's in government. it's everywhere, and there's NO EXCUSE why anyone WOULD miss it.
again, i'm not talking about bigfoot, or lizard people, or aliens, or anything of the sort. you can OBSERVE what i am saying RIGHT NOW, ALL AROUND YOU. jews EXIST, and ACT in the modern world. PERIOD. you can OBSERVE WHAT THE JEWS ARE SAYING AND DOING YOURSELF. there isn't even a need for historical research at this point, beyond attempting to grasp WHY the jews have been "persecuted throughout history"(kicked out of so many non-jew areas throughout history). and in order to answer that question, just LOOK AROUND YOU. pay attention. it has been made ILLEGAL(and in places where it's still legal, it's visibly PUNISHABLE) to question jews OR the holocaust(or in kyrie's case, to just post a link to a movie without any other context). when has it EVER been ILLEGAL to question ANYONE OR ANYTHING ELSE in the modern world? that in ITSELF should be giving you reason to suspect, that something is horribly, horribly wrong.
i feel like i have to limit what i post, because you're not going to make any attempt to even grasp ONE point i'm making; and due to me only having one post a day to work with(if i continue to play by the rules like a "nice guy", anyway), i try to fit in as much as possible. you taught me something, right? i was able to ACCEPT that you COULD be right about something, because that is LOGICAL. why is it, artu, that you cannot accept what i am pointing out, that YOU YOURSELF could check out? the snow i'm pointing out about jews is OBVIOUS to anyone paying attention to the events transpiring in the modern world today.
look, you actually made an effort in your last post to me. you looked something up, and found out a truth. so do it again, and go check out what jews themselves are saying and doing in mass media. check out the aipac, the adl, and the wef. they all have numerous sites and linked organizations and people you, just like anyone else, can access.
if you can actually give them some perusal, and APPLY CRITICAL THOUGHT, you might start to get the gist of WHY i rant about these people.
but I SHOULDN'T EVEN HAVE TO TELL YOU THAT. you SHOULD be able to discern these things for yourself, WITHOUT ME. they're an OPEN BOOK. go read them.
or don't, and keep arguing. you might get something semantical correct again. it's not like the cia(or any other agency), the "thinking on your own is illegal and makes you a bad person" mass programming media, or any other of the entities attempting to control the masses, will EVER use the term "conspiracy theory/ist" to discredit/silence dissent or critical thought. surely.
while i'm at it, speaking of critical thought, did you know that there are MORE THAN ONE instance of articles in mass media (and also direct copies of articles), "informing people" of the "dangers of critical thinking"? i only recently just found this out. i was formerly under the impression, that it was only ONE new york times article. nope.
is it any wonder, why just one guy (me), has such a difficult time trying to reach people with what's really going on? i mean, look at what i'm up against (just do a search on "the dangers of critical thinking", for one). billions, if not trillions of dollars, going into social engineering in mass media and online, in order to keep the masses under control. i'm talking about all of it, not just the anti-critical thinking articles.
finally, to address everything in the wikipedia article on conspiracy theory:
Quote:
A conspiracy theory is not the same as a conspiracy; instead, it refers to a hypothesized conspiracy with specific characteristics, such as an opposition to the mainstream consensus among those people (such as scientists or historians) who are qualified to evaluate its accuracy
"opposition to the mainstream consensus". important words. WHO creates the mainstream consensus (and just as importantly, WHO delineates WHO IS QUALIFIED)? well, look at the impact "mainstream consensus" has here at hc. if you understand human psychology, every one of you who attack anything OUTSIDE of "mainstream consensus", which the majority of you who post outside the gaming subforums do, do so because it IS the "majority consensus" to attack anyone who strays from the herd. going back to the early days of human civilization, this reaction to non-herd mentality was a survival tactic, meant to keep the herd strong, through unification.
and that mentality has allowed human civilization to last for centuries, so really, i can't complain in that regard. lots of advancement and some improvement to the overall quality of life.
that is the natural order of civilization, and i get it. i understand it's use.
but we stand to LOSE civilization now. what we are facing here is the single greatest threat to human civilization. the herd here at hc is outspoken against religion in general, and they are ENTIRELY neglecting the fact that ONE GROUP is acting in accordance with THEIR religion, which just HAPPENS to be the subjugation and ultimate DESTRUCTION of everyone OUTSIDE THEIR GROUP.
this group has a name. that name is "jews". they're not alone in their actions; and i never said they were. but they are the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY (despite being a minority worldwide) responsible for the plights, degradation, and destruction, of non-jews.
here's a little comic to demonstrate what should be obvious to a thinking adult:
with every one of you who DEFEND THEM; who ATTACK OTHER NON-JEWS who speak out, you are participating in your OWN people's destruction.
jews wouldn't BE powerful, despite being the minority, if it wasn't for people like you HELPING THEM. for all their wealth and control, they wouldn't have anything without YOUR KIND. and for this, i blame your kind MORE than the jews. at least with jews, i get it. a group acting in it's own interests. as despicable as they act that out, at least, they are acting in their own interests.
but YOU people? acting in ANOTHER GROUP'S interests, when their group is hell-bent on subjugating or outright DESTROYING YOU?
lol, what am i saying? your kind already do that for violent black criminals. as nearly anyone with eyes can see (or in this case, NEARLY anyone capable and willing of critical thought).
but, I KNOW WHY YOU RABIDLY DEFEND BLACK CRIMINALS. I KNOW WHO TRAINED YOU TO DO THAT. I KNOW WHO TRAINED YOU TO ACT IN YOUR OWN WORST INTERESTS.
(now back to waiting another day, or when my schedule permits, to post)
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 06, 2022 03:47 PM |
|
|
fred79 said:
but we stand to LOSE civilization now. what we are facing here is the single greatest threat to human civilization. the herd here at hc is outspoken against religion in general, and they are ENTIRELY neglecting the fact that ONE GROUP is acting in accordance with THEIR religion, which just HAPPENS to be the subjugation and ultimate DESTRUCTION of everyone OUTSIDE THEIR GROUP.
You've lost it completely now, haven't you.
Just stop squirming and struggling; convert already to Judaism and come over to the dark side, I know you want to be a winner. 
|
|
yogi
Promising
Famous Hero
of picnics
|
|
posted December 07, 2022 06:20 AM |
|
|
JollyJoker said:
It's like, "We have a 2500 year old history as a people
the current jewish calendar year is 5783
JollyJoker said:
since we were the first ones who believed in one god only
false
JollyJoker said:
and that we were His chosen people.
lol
JollyJoker said:
Our whole culture is centered around that belief and we were persecuted throughout history because of that.
astonishing
____________
yogi - class: monk | status: healthy
"Lol we are HC'ers.. The same tribe.. Guy!" ~Ghost
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 09, 2022 05:11 PM |
|
Edited by fred79 at 11:43, 13 Dec 2022.
|
JollyJoker said:
You've lost it completely now, haven't you.
the willfully ignorant calling people who AREN'T ignorant, "crazy", is not a sound judgement based on logic. which means, whenever you think someone is "crazy", you might want to take a look in the mirror.
i've posted a handful of things for any of you to research, and i've even posted proof of what i've said, from the jews' own mouths(or in this case, fingers).
and yet, none of you will actually look at what the jews themselves are saying, and doing. none of you are willing to even give the content any thought, whatsoever.
at least artu minimally tried over something semantical, once. strange how i haven't heard from him since then. maybe, he actually did some investigating of his own regarding the jews(snowball's chance in hell), and he found that that ONE semantical thing he was right about, was the ONLY thing he was right about.
or maybe(and which is infinitely more likely), he just outright IGNORED any validity to my statements, because it snows with his semitic programming. which is odd, coming from a turk who's living in a country full of muslims. you would have thought, that someone would have educated him, by now.
or maybe, the people there are just as programmed as the majority of the western world.
being that the majority of hc'ers are willfully ignorant on literally EVERYTHING i and others like myself have been trying to reach them with throughout the years(which anyone could peruse by finding any of the threads corribus locked); it's not like any of this is going anywhere with them. they're content being domesticated cattle, and the moderators here are content with hc'ers being domesticated, too. you people are the first line of defense, and the bulk of the power, of corrupt and malicious tyrants everywhere. it is through your COMPLIANCE and WILLINGNESS to subjugate your fellow man in the TYRANTS' best interest, that i find completely, absolutely, unrelentingly abhorrent about the lot of you.
barring any further idiotic replies that i'll feel compelled to evaluate and spit upon, i think i'll be moving on to greener pastures.
|
|
Ghost
Undefeatable Hero
Therefore I am
|
|
posted December 09, 2022 07:15 PM |
|
|
|
A pity! I don't understand.. Language barrier! What fred was trying to say/tell to my thread..
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 09, 2022 07:43 PM |
|
|
He says that everyone here is too ignorant to acknowledge his flawless chain of evidence, sorry, proof about the Jews being, you know, the tyrants of the world, and therefore, lo and behold,
he's moving on (to greener pastures), he promises,
but I suspect he won't be true to his word.
People like him ... we had a coup attempt in Germany thwarted, imagine that. These people are beyond reason.
|
|
Ghost
Undefeatable Hero
Therefore I am
|
|
posted December 09, 2022 08:26 PM |
|
|
I'm using Samsung Internet. Maybe I should change chairs. The computer has Google Chrome to translate into Finnish. But Jews *FACEPALM*  I don't understand everyone things, because I read English for advancement..
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 13, 2022 12:10 PM |
|
|
JollyJoker said:
He says that everyone here is too ignorant to acknowledge his flawless chain of evidence, sorry, proof about the Jews being, you know, the tyrants of the world, and therefore, lo and behold,
he's moving on (to greener pastures), he promises,
but I suspect he won't be true to his word.
People like him ... we had a coup attempt in Germany thwarted, imagine that. These people are beyond reason.
you say this, as your government officials are looking to import millions of immigrants from non-white nations to replace you and your family. which they're doing in EVERY predominantly white nation, and have been for years now.
YOU people are beyond reason. they're out in the open with what they're doing, and you people keep your heads in the sand, calling anyone pointing out the reality of what is happening around you, "conspiracy theorists".
so spew all the retarded bullsnow you want, jj. you and all the others like you.
you all have lost your snowing minds, and you're GOING to lose everything else because of it. because you wanted to stay asleep.
too bad; i liked germany a great deal while i was there. back in the 2000's, the only bulk non-nationals i saw in my time in europe, were in amsterdam. they were turkish, and they were trying to sell everyone hard drugs.
which was just a taste of what was coming around the corner, for predominantly white nations. a massive movement of non-nationals, destroying the cultures, the nations, and the people therein. all while idiots like you sat on their asses and denied reality around you.
go ahead and call me crazy, while everything around you screams out the proof of what i'm pointing out, that you can see in the news and in your own governments. you're all just plain retarded, and you're corrosive to every single goddamn thing of real value.
p.s. i said i would be leaving this thread, barring retarded replies like yours which i would feel compelled to respond to. which i did; if only to spit upon it, just like i said i would. i know everything is hard for people like you to understand the first 1000 times, so i repeated myself.
p.p.s. you know what i find odd? none of you go on about migrants anymore(of those that did). i wonder why that is. are the rest of you giving up even attempting to address the problem? or have you all been assimilated finally?
maybe it was the shot that broke your spirits, mentally(maybe even physically, who knows?). i want you all to notice how a normal person reacts to the world around them, who didn't get any of those shots. pay attention while you're still up and moving around. that "suddenly dropping dead" seems to be a thing, more and more. enjoy the coagulated blood and whatever else oozing through your veins.
all i know is, i'm not alone. when they're through getting rid of all of you, my people will still be standing; barring catastrophic destruction.
|
|
Gnomes2169
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Duke of the Glade
|
|
posted December 13, 2022 05:00 PM |
|
|
Fred, it’s not that you’ve made such an ironclad case that you can’t be refuted. It’s that people don’t respond to you anymore because it’s pointless. You scream and you rant and you throw tantrums like a child, but with all the smug, self-righteousness of an evangelical pastor denouncing heretics from your pulpit. It would be infuriating if it wasn’t so damn sad.
Not triggering. Not enlightened. Not sending people to their bed weeping salty globalist tears. Your bigotry, venom and hatred are just… sad.
And it’s not something new. Your story has been repeated time and time again; Someone who suffered major setbacks in their life and realized just how insignificant they were began looking for someone to blame, and latched on to the idea of a shadowy organization. Some grand evil orchestrating everything that is “wrong” with society, everything that caused their trauma, and that gave them something to fight. To rail against. An evil that was so vast it covered the world, but so fragile that it could be toppled by the actions of a small group of individuals. A storybook villain that could be destroyed. An evil that they can rise up against and cast down and then pass bloody judgement on everyone who enabled them.
They latch on because the idea that this evil exists is more comforting to them than the idea that nothing is simple, there are no masterminds, the people who are publicly in control only have a loose hold of the leash and chaos and absolute disorder and desolation are always just a few steps away. No one can truly control every variable, know every input or plan for every outcome, and so much hardship and cruelty and pain happen not because of malice, but because of ignorance from those with more chips to play, or desperation from those who have nothing. The delusional thought of a globe-spanning evil is more comforting than the truth that nobody matters, and that the universe does not care one iota for anyone on this speck of matter in the infinite, slowly dying void of reality.
It’s… sad. It’s pathetic and sad. Because they hate so insanely ferociously that nothing and no one can save them from themselves. There’s nothing that anyone can say to change their mind, no arguments that can sway them, no act of compassion that they won’t spit upon and denounce. And so people leave them. Friends stop wanting to spend time with them, family stop inviting them over for holidays and events, acquaintances on the internet stop interacting with them or arguing against their theories, and then they end up turning to the echo chambers where they began being radicalized in the first place.
But no one there truly cares about them, it’s just a place to scream and spew hatred, a place that demands every member stay strong and resolute in the face of impossible odds, that sees any emotion other than rage as weakness, any stance but aggression a vulnerability that could be exploited by the enemy that is everywhere. It is a sad, tiny, lonely box of self hatred and sorrow that no one can help them with because asking for help is weakness and they are not weak. Right?
Some people at this point will live out the rest of their lives alone. Oh, talking to other people in the paranoid bubble of hatred and delusion, but without any real connection because no one knows if someone on the other side of the screen is a “sleeper agent.” Some of them are pushed to go out and die in a blaze of bullets and blood, a lone wolf screaming their righteousness against an evil that only exists in their heads as they butcher innocents in the name of “strength” and “defiance.” And some of them burn out and realize that it was always just a lie, that there was nothing to rally against, that they were just afraid all the time and they threw away every relationship that mattered to them in the name of a cause that never existed. And those people can recover… if they don’t take their lives first.
But that’s not everyone. And no one was ever saved by some randos on the internet trying to point out all the logical holes in their arguments, or all the lies and delusions they suffered, because it was never about logic or the truth. It’s just fear, a scramble for control, and comfort in a cause. A cause that might hate them, use them, spit on them and say all their sacrifices are never good enough… but something that they can dedicate themselves to anyway.
So people don’t really respond to you anymore, Fred… because it’s pointless. And it’s sad. All of your bigotry and self righteousness and zeal is… sad. Dangerous too, but mostly just to yourself.
I genuinely hope that you save yourself and snap out of this before you truly lose everything in your life that matters to you. I would spare you that isolation and suffering if I could… but I can’t change your mind. So it’s better to just cut you away and leave you to solve your own problems. Hopefully you can find your way back to reality, but I’m not going to hold my breath while I wait.
____________
Yeah in the 18th century, two inventions suggested a method of measurement. One won and the other stayed in America.
-Ghost destroying Fred
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted December 15, 2022 03:50 AM |
|
Edited by fred79 at 02:11, 29 Dec 2022.
|
i had a really long post, that i deleted instead. instead, the following is a shortened version.
gnomes, stop playing armchair psychologist, blathering on about existentialism and hippy love snow, and stay focused. i want you to understand, that you haven't discredited ONE thing i've said. telling me that there's something wrong with me for pointing out negative things about jews, ISN'T AN ARGUMENT.
also, i've TOLD you the names of jewish organizations that are REAL, and you make some snowing retarded remark about "shadow organizations".
i'll repeat AGAIN:
they
are
out
in
the
open
about
what
they
are
doing.
these organizations (and just random snowing everyday jews in every aspect of western society; i've found), can be studied:
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE (ADL).
AMERICAN ISRAELI PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE (AIPAC).
JEWISH WORLD CONGRESS.
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM.
THE ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA (ZOA).
here, i'll post it again(a screenshot i myself took of the aipac's twitter account):
tell me, are any of you any good at MATH?????????????????????????????????????
you've already PROVEN you're not good with LOGIC. even SIMPLE logic.
edit: added another jewish organization; that predates World War 1 by 15 years.
|
| |
|
|
