|
|
Pawek_13
Supreme Hero
Maths, maths everywhere!
|
posted January 23, 2015 12:51 PM |
|
|
Dave_Jame said: I Actually like that part.. Gives a bit mystic into the unit
Me too. Moreover, I thimk that this cloud was intended to move into opposite direction, to " live its own life". Its role is a little bit like scarf - it covers respective part of body loosely, so that it presented but not completely.
|
|
Storm-Giant
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
On the Other Side!
|
posted January 23, 2015 01:46 PM |
|
|
Kenishi said: Radar
"I must disagree. The body does not blend smoothly into the spiral. In fact the two are rather out of sync animation-wise and are going in opposite directions.
I guess it won't be that much of a problem once it's zoomed out on the battlefield, though.
Indeed, it will be an unidentifiable blue blop
____________
|
|
Stevie
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:05 PM |
|
|
JeremiahEmo said: that's really cool Marzhin. I really want to ask something.
Are Druids male?
Come on, at least hints. Clues??
Marzhin said: @JeremiahEmo: It'll be a female druid, like on the reference artwork we posted during the vote (although the actual design will be different).
DRUIDS FEMALE CONFIRMED!!
____________
Guide to a Great Heroes Game
The Young Traveler
|
|
Sandro400
Promising
Supreme Hero
Shadow of Death
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:11 PM |
|
|
Stevie said: DRUIDS FEMALE CONFIRMED!!
I'm not sure if he said this for serious or to troll Jeremiah
But I don't think there'll be problems with female Druids. They're mages and healers afterall.
Metamagic reminds me of H5 Warlock's Elemetal Chains btw.
And dat Raja's fun animation!
____________
Let's play poker game, lich-style!
|
|
Dave_Jame
Promising
Legendary Hero
I'm Faceless, not Brainless.
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:18 PM |
|
|
Sandro400 said:
Stevie said: DRUIDS FEMALE CONFIRMED!!
I'm not sure if he said this for serious or to troll Jeremiah
But I don't think there'll be problems with female Druids. They're mages and healers afterall.
Metamagic reminds of me H5 Warlock's Elemetal Chains btw.
And dat Raja's fun animation!
Yeah, I got the same idea. May Be slightly different mechanic but same principle. Giving bonus to a group of spells
|
|
War-overlord
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Presidente of Isla del Tropico
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:19 PM |
|
|
Sandro400 said:
Stevie said: DRUIDS FEMALE CONFIRMED!!
I'm not sure if he said this for serious or to troll Jeremiah
But I don't think there'll be problems with female Druids. They're mages and healers afterall.
I wouldn't have a problem with either.
I think by now, Marzhin is aware of Jeremiah's Agenda and behaviour. So trolling him for a bit of fun, might lighten the mood a bit.
On the other hand, I don't think many people other than him are that bothered about the gender of a given unit. So making the Druid female is not very laden descision.
It would be historically inaccurate, but fantasy in general has never been held back by that fact that in Celtic-times, all Druids were men. And unless you specifically try to replicate a faux-celtic society, which Sylvan isn't, it doesn't bother me much.
____________
Vote El Presidente! Or Else!
|
|
Kronos1000
Promising
Supreme Hero
Fryslân Boppe
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:25 PM |
|
|
Sandro400 said:
Stevie said: DRUIDS FEMALE CONFIRMED!!
I'm not sure if he said this for serious or to troll Jeremiah
But I don't think there'll be problems with female Druids. They're mages and healers afterall.
I think Marzhin was serious; it sure sounded serious. Anyway, druids could be either male or female in Heroes 3 (It was a hero class) and in MMX, so I don't see what the big deal is. I thought that artwork looked pretty cool.
By the way, his response was hilarious:
Quote: You sure know how to make a grown man cry.
____________
Hwær cwom mearg? Hwær cwom mago?
Hwær cwom maþþumgyfa? - 'The Wanderer'
|
|
Sandro400
Promising
Supreme Hero
Shadow of Death
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:28 PM |
|
|
War-overlord said: It would be historically inaccurate, but fantasy in general has never been held back by that fact that in Celtic-times, all Druids were men. And unless you specifically try to replicate a faux-celtic society, which Sylvan isn't, it doesn't bother me much.
I'll say more: in today's fantasy, Druids are like Nature Wizards, who live in harmony with forests, animal etc but IRL they made human sacrifices and maybe practitioned cannibalism, so female Druid is the least thing to worry about for those who like fantasy to be historically accurate
Kronos1000 said: Anyway, druids could be either male or female in Heroes 3 (It was a hero class) and in MMX, so I don't see what the big deal is. I thought that artwork looked pretty cool.
By the way, his response was hilarious:
Quote: You sure know how to make a grown man cry.
That too. I still remember Gem.
Its certainly not a big deal but there're people... "troubled" with this descision
The response made my day
____________
Let's play poker game, lich-style!
|
|
Stevie
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:31 PM |
|
Edited by Stevie at 14:31, 23 Jan 2015.
|
I have no problem with females in support roles at all. It's the warriors types that are hit or miss for me. For example, a female rogue would be more intuitive because they don't rely heavily on physical strength to apply damage and they like backstabbing rather than a two handed warrior female with a claymore. For this reason I think that the female Justicar is a bit iffy.
____________
Guide to a Great Heroes Game
The Young Traveler
|
|
War-overlord
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Presidente of Isla del Tropico
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:33 PM |
|
|
Sandro400 said: I'll say more: in today's fantasy, Druids are like Nature Wizards, who live in harmony with forests, animal etc but IRL they made human sacrifices and maybe practitioned cannibalism, so female Druid is the least thing to worry about for those who like fantasy to be historically accurate
Historically accurate fantasy is something of a paradox anyway.
On a different note, the whole human-sacrifice thing has very little archeological evidence and may just have been roman propaganda. But let's not get sidetracked.
____________
Vote El Presidente! Or Else!
|
|
Sandro400
Promising
Supreme Hero
Shadow of Death
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:40 PM |
|
|
Stevie said: For this reason I think that the female Justicar is a bit iffy.
She's more the fancing type, wearing a small sword that looks like a big dirk (though I think rapiers would fit them more) + small shield and basing their strategy on outmanoeuving and counter-attacking. Their your actual strength has little impact, 'cos the fighting style relies on reaction and qiuckness, the work will be done by the sharp tip.
*If somebody here played Dark Souls, she sure seems like thrusting sword + shield parrying build.
War-overlord said:
Historically accurate fantasy is something of a paradox anyway.
I meant fantasy game, sorry.
____________
Let's play poker game, lich-style!
|
|
War-overlord
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Presidente of Isla del Tropico
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:43 PM |
|
|
Sandro400 said:
War-overlord said: Historically accurate fantasy is something of a paradox anyway.
I meant fantasy game, sorry.
That don't make it any less paradoxical.
____________
Vote El Presidente! Or Else!
|
|
Zombi_Wizzard
Famous Hero
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:51 PM |
|
|
Almost all ancient cultures practiced some form of human sacrafice, yes to some degree even Romans. Altho it is true that some did it to more extent than others, and some abolished it earlier than others.
It's true tho, that by the time of iron age, it became less frequent, as most religions of the time changed rituals, with replacements ... like burning human figurines made of straw etc. So naturaly those societies would regard those that still practice human sacrafice as "barbaric".
|
|
Dave_Jame
Promising
Legendary Hero
I'm Faceless, not Brainless.
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:51 PM |
|
|
War-overlord said:
Sandro400 said:
War-overlord said: Historically accurate fantasy is something of a paradox anyway.
I meant fantasy game, sorry.
That don't make it any less paradoxical.
No it is not. It's only how you depict the setting. You can have a fantasy tale set in a historically accurate setting, with both fictional and historical characters and a limited use of supernatural. But that would be a very log discussion :-).
|
|
War-overlord
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Presidente of Isla del Tropico
|
posted January 23, 2015 02:54 PM |
|
|
I said Paradox, Dave. Not Contradiction.
____________
Vote El Presidente! Or Else!
|
|
Sandro400
Promising
Supreme Hero
Shadow of Death
|
posted January 23, 2015 03:09 PM |
|
|
War-overlord said: I said Paradox, Dave. Not Contradiction.
[off-top]
Apparent contradiction that may yet be true is called Paradox
[/off-top]
____________
Let's play poker game, lich-style!
|
|
Stevie
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted January 23, 2015 03:13 PM |
|
|
|
War-overlord
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Presidente of Isla del Tropico
|
posted January 23, 2015 03:14 PM |
|
|
Sandro400 said: [off-top]
Apparent contradiction that may yet be true is called Paradox
[/off-top]
I know that. That is why I say that historiccaly accurate fantasy is paradoxical. Dave responded as if I had said it was contradictory. At first at first the ideas of historicall accuracy and fantasy seem to clash, but they do not have to. However, usually historical accuracy is a detrement to fantasy.
Stevie said: So Dave said it's not an apparent contradiction, what's the problem?
The problem is that he doesn't. He states that it is not a contradiction, which I know and I never claimed.
____________
Vote El Presidente! Or Else!
|
|
Storm-Giant
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
On the Other Side!
|
posted January 23, 2015 04:57 PM |
|
|
|
Stevie
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted January 23, 2015 04:59 PM |
|
Edited by Stevie at 13:36, 26 Jan 2015.
|
|
|