|
|
william
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
LummoxLewis
|
posted February 09, 2010 08:23 PM |
|
|
Hmmmmm, on HC, am I the only one that dislikes Titanic and think it's an overrated piece of crap?
____________
~Ticking away the moments that
make up a dull day, Fritter and
waste the hours in an off-hand
way~
|
|
blizzardboy
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Nerf Herder
|
posted February 09, 2010 08:40 PM |
|
|
No, you'd be part of the 90% of young adult males that hate it.
____________
"Folks, I don't trust children. They're here to replace us."
|
|
VokialBG
Honorable
Legendary Hero
First in line
|
posted February 09, 2010 09:03 PM |
|
|
Well, Titanic...
It's a good movie and I think I like it but I hate Leonardo Diaprio
____________
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
posted February 09, 2010 09:55 PM |
|
|
Quote: Hmmmmm, on HC, am I the only one that dislikes Titanic and think it's an overrated piece of crap?
Piece of crap, no. Overrated, yes. Average love movie. No masterpiece.
I never understood what people like in it. There are dozens "love movies" much better than that average one. Was it because of the soundtrack? (which was good, yeah)
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
william
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
LummoxLewis
|
posted February 09, 2010 09:56 PM |
|
|
I don't know, I just thought it was a piece of crap. Seen hundreds of movies better than it. My main complaint about the movie is that it's so boring and it puts me to sleep. Oh well, each to their own.
____________
~Ticking away the moments that
make up a dull day, Fritter and
waste the hours in an off-hand
way~
|
|
Shares
Supreme Hero
I am. Thusly I am.
|
posted February 09, 2010 10:17 PM |
|
Edited by Shares at 22:26, 09 Feb 2010.
|
I haven't seen it, but I know it's a love movie. So let me guess:
A guy and a girl gets on a giant boat called Titanic (Duh!). There's something separating them, knowing my history I'd say one of 'ems lower class and the other upper class. Since it's always the guy who has to do all the chasing and all the work I'd say the guy's poor. They fall in love and get togather, an event happens and they get mad at each other. One of them, propably the girl, almost dies when the boat crashes into a big pile of water. She is saved just in time by the guy. What happens now is a bit harder to predict, but since the girl had to be saved they propably got late for the rescue boats and most of them left. So the girl gets on a boat but doesn't want to leave without the girlguy (oops!), just to show the viewers that they're in love. The guy gets in the boat, but since he's a movie guy (a hero, with strong morals) he leaves it in favour of some poor lady or kid or sumthin.
How it ends after that is the only thing that is hard to actually predict without seeing the movie, since I have no idea if they (the writers) get to kill people or if they just die. So either they both get out of there alive and live happily ever after, but I've heard rumors that it's a sad movie, so I'd guess one of 'em dies!
That about it?
____________
|
|
DagothGares
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
No gods or kings
|
posted February 09, 2010 10:23 PM |
|
|
You're scarily accurate, until the halfway part...
Then it's... okay...
____________
If you have any more questions, go to Dagoth Cares.
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
posted February 09, 2010 10:23 PM |
|
|
You forgot the obvious cliche: the guy gives his life for the girl.
Now, I have nothing against cliches, in fact I like most of them, but calling it a masterpiece? Based on what?
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
Shares
Supreme Hero
I am. Thusly I am.
|
posted February 09, 2010 10:24 PM |
|
Edited by Shares at 22:26, 09 Feb 2010.
|
Oh, right! So it's the guy who dies!
@Dagoth: What's wrong then?
____________
|
|
DagothGares
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
No gods or kings
|
posted February 09, 2010 10:27 PM |
|
|
Neither of them gets on the life boat.
There was a bit of a hssle with those...
____________
If you have any more questions, go to Dagoth Cares.
|
|
Shares
Supreme Hero
I am. Thusly I am.
|
posted February 09, 2010 10:31 PM |
|
|
Ah, I did say they were late. I just assumed that there was that last one! There's always a last one for the ladies!
____________
|
|
Elvin
Admirable
Omnipresent Hero
Endless Revival
|
posted February 10, 2010 04:27 PM |
|
|
Lol
Tom Cruise Confirmed for Mission Impossible IV. The third was a joke already.
____________
H5 is still alive and kicking, join us in the Duel Map discord server!
Map also hosted on Moddb
|
|
william
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
LummoxLewis
|
posted February 10, 2010 04:34 PM |
|
|
Lol yuck, that sickens me.
____________
~Ticking away the moments that
make up a dull day, Fritter and
waste the hours in an off-hand
way~
|
|
blizzardboy
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Nerf Herder
|
posted February 10, 2010 04:41 PM |
|
|
Quote: You forgot the obvious cliche: the guy gives his life for the girl.
Now, I have nothing against cliches, in fact I like most of them, but calling it a masterpiece? Based on what?
I actually don't think the movie is hardly cliche at all. What is cliche, sickeningly cliche, is the hundreds of so-called romances where the guy meets the girl, the guy doesn't tell her something but he's going to, she finds out before he has the chance to tell her, and then at the end he has to chase her down and grovel at her feet like a dog for forgiveness. The sole purpose of the movie is to butter up the female ego.
Titanic is a movie about two people from different worlds that love each other, which oddly enough, is pretty uncommon anymore. How many movies are like that? It's actually hard to think of them.
The reason I think it's a masterpiece is because it was strong in every area. It had good characters, setting, detail, acting, and the technical aspects were very good too. I liked how so much of the movie focused on the social/economic differences, right down to the way the wealthy were flocked to the lifeboats and took off even without being filled to capacity, while almost every 3rd class passenger died. And then in sharp contrast to that stiff hierarchy, Jack freezes in the water while Rose lives, not because he's poor and she's rich, but because he loves her.
I wouldn't put it in my top 20, after all, romance is pretty low on my list of genres, but I still really liked it. And I don't get the hate towards DiCaprio cause I think he's a good actor. The Man in the Iron Mask permanently gave me a positive image of him because he did an awesome job with Louis XIV.
____________
"Folks, I don't trust children. They're here to replace us."
|
|
Fauch
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted February 10, 2010 06:21 PM |
|
|
I remember "catch me if you can" was pretty fun
Quote: Tom Cruise Confirmed for Mission Impossible IV. The third was a joke already.
I liked the 2nd one, the 3rd one was disappointing.
actually I don't remember much from the 1st and the 3rd, except the scene in the safe, in the 1st one.
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
posted February 10, 2010 06:44 PM |
|
|
Quote:
Quote: You forgot the obvious cliche: the guy gives his life for the girl.
Now, I have nothing against cliches, in fact I like most of them, but calling it a masterpiece? Based on what?
I actually don't think the movie is hardly cliche at all. What is cliche, sickeningly cliche, is the hundreds of so-called romances where the guy meets the girl, the guy doesn't tell her something but he's going to, she finds out before he has the chance to tell her, and then at the end he has to chase her down and grovel at her feet like a dog for forgiveness. The sole purpose of the movie is to butter up the female ego.
Yes, that's correct. But no one called those masterpieces, so I don't complain.
Quote: Titanic is a movie about two people from different worlds that love each other, which oddly enough, is pretty uncommon anymore. How many movies are like that? It's actually hard to think of them.
Movies certainly not but there are plenty of stories with different social classes (one poor, one rich) falling in love. Plenty.
Quote: The reason I think it's a masterpiece is because it was strong in every area. It had good characters, setting, detail, acting, and the technical aspects were very good too. I liked how so much of the movie focused on the social/economic differences, right down to the way the wealthy were flocked to the lifeboats and took off even without being filled to capacity, while almost every 3rd class passenger died. And then in sharp contrast to that stiff hierarchy, Jack freezes in the water while Rose lives, not because he's poor and she's rich, but because he loves her.
For a movie that's supposed to be set in a realistic setting I found the love pretty unrealistic btw.
Quote: And I don't get the hate towards DiCaprio cause I think he's a good actor. The Man in the Iron Mask permanently gave me a positive image of him because he did an awesome job with Louis XIV.
Well I didn't like him being such a wimp on Titanic, though in Blood Diamond he had badass surgery
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
blizzardboy
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Nerf Herder
|
posted February 10, 2010 06:54 PM |
|
|
He was a poor lover-boy artist. What do you want? Bulging muscles and a huge iron sword? I mean I guess if you don't like the character, you don't like the character, but he did a really good job based on what was asked from him imo.
As for the realism part, while it's obviously not the typical relationship and intended to be an extraordinary occurrence, it's not at all outside the realm of possibility. It's not as though something equally extraordinary has never happened before. A director would be hard pressed to make an engaging story about a couple that meets up, dates for a year or two, gets married, has a few kids, and goes to work on the weekdays. Not that there's anything unsatisfying about that kind of existence, but exceptions are what make entertaining tales.
____________
"Folks, I don't trust children. They're here to replace us."
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
posted February 10, 2010 07:07 PM |
|
|
I didn't say he acted badly. I only said I didn't like him.
This doesn't mean I "rate" him poorly -- when I don't like something, not because of the quality of the work done but simply because I, personally, don't like it, I don't rate it at all -- after all, rating is not a question of tastes (unlike some other people on the interwebs ).
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
DagothGares
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
No gods or kings
|
posted February 10, 2010 07:11 PM |
|
|
Judging titanic, while not liking Leonardo Dicaprio is like judging french cheese, while being lactose-intolerant.
____________
If you have any more questions, go to Dagoth Cares.
|
|
Fauch
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
posted February 10, 2010 07:25 PM |
|
|
Quote: Movies certainly not but there are plenty of stories with different social classes (one poor, one rich) falling in love. Plenty.
la vie est un long fleuve tranquille? (not sure)
|
|
|