|
| Thread: Trump campaign's lawsuits dropped in 4 States |  This thread is pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 · «PREV / NEXT» |
|
Minion
Legendary Hero
|
posted November 28, 2020 05:27 PM |
|
|
fred79 said:
i wonder how you're going to react if the truth ever comes out about what went down? i wonder if they'll ever even HAVE to admit to you, what really happened?
you know, you never answered my questions posed to you from the other thread. why not?
Sorry, What was the question?
I will react by condemning voter fraud completely and explicitly which ever side does it. If such voter fraud would happen, it would be the scandal of our life time. And I will react accordingly.
@Gandalf, why are you completely silent about the new decision made by Pennsylvania courts, that I linked to? Odd to ignore in such a way 
This one : "The panel of three judges deemed the case was without merit, saying the Trump campaign had not made specific allegations OR provided proof.
|
|
Gandalf196
Disgraceful
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 05:59 PM |
|
|
____________
|
|
Gandalf196
Disgraceful
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 06:01 PM |
|
|
Minion said:
fred79 said:
i wonder how you're going to react if the truth ever comes out about what went down? i wonder if they'll ever even HAVE to admit to you, what really happened?
you know, you never answered my questions posed to you from the other thread. why not?
Sorry, What was the question?
I will react by condemning voter fraud completely and explicitly which ever side does it. If such voter fraud would happen, it would be the scandal of our life time. And I will react accordingly.
@Gandalf, why are you completely silent about the new decision made by Pennsylvania courts, that I linked to? Odd to ignore in such a way
This one : "The panel of three judges deemed the case was without merit, saying the Trump campaign had not made specific allegations OR provided proof.
The legal battle happens at multiple fronts at the same time. I just posted a very favorable decision that basically paves the legal way to the Supreme Court.
____________
|
|
Minion
Legendary Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 06:17 PM |
|
|
Can you explain how do you think(know!) Trump will win Pennsylvania exactly?
____________
"These friends probably started using condoms after having produced the most optimum amount of offsprings. Kudos to them for showing at least some restraint" - Tsar-ivor
|
|
Gandalf196
Disgraceful
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 06:31 PM |
|
|
Minion said:
Can you explain how do you think(know!) Trump will win Pennsylvania exactly?
C'mon, man. You know we trumptards are being delusional, relax, enjoy the ride, Orange Man will never be president (he never was in the first place!!!!!) again
____________
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 07:41 PM |
|
|
Well, he wasn't. He was elected into the office, but he wasn't president. He held the ofice 4 years, but as a president he was an impostor.
And the idea that the Supreme Court should have a go at this is preposterous. The Supreme Court deals with judicial decisions that are reviewed with a view on whether the decision is constitutional or not.
What judicial decision is supposed to be reviewed by the supreme court?
|
|
Blizzardboy
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Nerf Herder
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 08:57 PM |
|
|
The cases are so silly they aren't being considered for future precedent.
But, as far as I am aware, the state supreme courts do have the latitude to refer a specific case to the federal Supreme Court and the federal Supreme Court can decide to review it or not. As childish as the situation is, it is a very high profile case that concerns the presidency, so it might be nice to have the Supreme Court rule on it just to nail the coffin as tightly as possible. The US has always had it easy with peaceful transitions of power from one admin to another, and you never know if 8 or 20 or 50+ years from now if there won't be another president even more unbalanced than the current one that tries to wage these legal battles.
____________
"Folks, I don't trust children. They're here to replace us."
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 09:30 PM |
|
|
nuts. just plain NUTS. it boggles my mind how someone can see a different reality like this. and not just one person, but millions...
jesus.
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 09:55 PM |
|
Edited by fred79 at 22:04, 28 Nov 2020.
|
Minion said:
Sorry, What was the question?
I will react by condemning voter fraud completely and explicitly which ever side does it. If such voter fraud would happen, it would be the scandal of our life time. And I will react accordingly.
you haven't thus far. you and the others have been given links to the proof. clear-cut proof, no doubts about it.
me personally, i was awake most of the 4 days during the election; i had gotten only 2 hours of sleep in each of those 4 days. i was awake when the msm made the mistake of posting the graph that baronus posted in this very thread, that they later took down. i was awake when the "magic ballots" were tallied at 4am the morning after the election(after they claimed they were done counting for the night and sent republican counters home) in the key states where Trump had been previously leading. i've been on the front lines, so to speak, regarding all the information flow and digging into clear-cut, simply explainable data. i've been compiling the same data that was all put onto one website where it was all readily available, that you all flat-out ignored thus far. there is NO QUESTION election fraud on a MASSIVE SCALE took place; and CERTAINLY in favor of the globalist candidates(biden and harris). this is perhaps the greatest scandal to happen to the United States; barring other events that you people also deny the reality of, in favor of the globalist narrative given to you on CLEARLY globalist-controlled media WORLDWIDE.
if this scandal wakes you people up(if it ever IS revealed to you all by the media you people trust like it's god's word), it will be a miracle.
i'm currently hunting for the questions i posed in the other thread, as i'm not sure which thread they were in. when i find them, i'll repost them.
edit: here are the questions, referring to the influence over regular people and their reasoning regarding their own parts in this scandal:
Quote:
let me ask you something: what do you think the impact would be on someone who only gets their "news" from the obviously left-leaning msm, who PRIMARILY communicates daily with others who do the same, and for 4 YEARS, the msm tells you the president stole the last election from a woman, that russia helped him do it, and that this man is literally hitler?
can you commit a crime against hitler? would you feel BAD about it? would you think there would be a COORDINATED effort to keep him from becoming president AGAIN, if he were HITLER?
answer those questions. and ffs, be honest with yourself. and with me.
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 10:28 PM |
|
|
I answered this already. Comparing Trump with Hitler is an insult - to both, actually. Because Trump didn't start what would become a global war and he also didn't kill 6 million Jews plus an assortment of undesirables, like gipsies or gays.
On the other hand Hitler was a driven maniac, following a deluded path to some supposed greater good, fueled by the trauma of his first-hand experience in the poison gas trenches of WW 1. Trump is fueled by his narcissism, if anything.
No one is painting him as Hitler. They are just painting him as INEPT.
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 10:30 PM |
|
|
|
you misunderstood the question, which is why i didn't ask you, but minion. maybe he'll understand it.
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 10:44 PM |
|
|
|
I didn't misunderstand the question. It's just that the question doesn't make sense because no one did what you assume.
|
|
fred79
Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 11:00 PM |
|
|
so you intentionally answered a question that doesn't make sense to you?
lol, why?
|
|
Gandalf196
Disgraceful
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 11:01 PM |
|
|
JollyJoker said:
Well, he wasn't. He was elected into the office, but he wasn't president. He held the ofice 4 years, but as a president he was an impostor.
And the idea that the Supreme Court should have a go at this is preposterous. The Supreme Court deals with judicial decisions that are reviewed with a view on whether the decision is constitutional or not.
What judicial decision is supposed to be reviewed by the supreme court?
LOL
Tell that to Judge Patricia McCullough
____________
|
|
Gandalf196
Disgraceful
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 11:05 PM |
|
|
fred79 said:
nuts. just plain NUTS. it boggles my mind how someone can see a different reality like this. and not just one person, but millions...
jesus.
I'm sorry, Fred, but this is far beyond nuts. Their TDS is
____________
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 11:07 PM |
|
|
|
Well, what "constutional problem" is the supreme court supposed to deal with?
|
|
Gandalf196
Disgraceful
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 11:09 PM |
|
|
JollyJoker said:
Well, what "constutional problem" is the supreme court supposed to deal with?
Jesus, man, just read, she makes it absolutely clear
Quote:
Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election
For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing
____________
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 11:50 PM |
|
|
You see, that this is a theoretical question, right?
"Purportedly" unconstitutional election...
The judge basically asks, should things proceed as long as there are rumours about, the election might have been unconstitutional. Because that's what they are. There is no evidence at all.
So, let's see. Guy's on trial, guilty, death penalty. Death penalty is suposed to be carried out. There are a lot of supporters of the defendant and they claim the trial was rigged. Judge stops the execution with the appeal, that there has been a "purportedly unconstitutional trial", what with all the rumors about, claiming the defendant being not guilty...
I mean, I hope you see the problem...
|
|
Gandalf196
Disgraceful
Supreme Hero
|
|
posted November 28, 2020 11:58 PM |
|
|
JollyJoker said:
You see, that this is a theoretical question, right?
"Purportedly" unconstitutional election...
The judge basically asks, should things proceed as long as there are rumours about, the election might have been unconstitutional. Because that's what they are. There is no evidence at all.
So, let's see. Guy's on trial, guilty, death penalty. Death penalty is suposed to be carried out. There are a lot of supporters of the defendant and they claim the trial was rigged. Judge stops the execution with the appeal, that there has been a "purportedly unconstitutional trial", what with all the rumors about, claiming the defendant being not guilty...
I mean, I hope you see the problem...
Man, you have no idea what you're talking about. You cannot make any claim and hope to succeed... The Judge "smells" something fishy and, because of that, makes way for his suit to go to the Supreme Court. In a sense, she has approved the alpha version of the evidence Trump's team has presented.
____________
|
|
Blizzardboy
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Nerf Herder
|
|
posted November 29, 2020 12:00 AM |
|
|
JollyJoker said:
Well, what "constutional problem" is the supreme court supposed to deal with?
They can review anything related to constitutionality or to federal law, so the election process would be within their purview.
Granted the case will be a very easy thing to review, but having it come from the highest court would be nice for the country.
____________
"Folks, I don't trust children. They're here to replace us."
|
|
|
|
