Heroes of Might and Magic Community
visiting hero! Register | Today's Posts | Games | Search! | FAQ/Rules | AvatarList | MemberList | Profile


Age of Heroes Headlines:  
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
6 Aug 2016: Troubled Heroes VII Expansion Release - read more
26 Apr 2016: Heroes VII XPack - Trial by Fire - Coming out in June! - read more
17 Apr 2016: Global Alternative Creatures MOD for H7 after 1.8 Patch! - read more
7 Mar 2016: Romero launches a Piano Sonata Album Kickstarter! - read more
19 Feb 2016: Heroes 5.5 RC6, Heroes VII patch 1.7 are out! - read more
13 Jan 2016: Horn of the Abyss 1.4 Available for Download! - read more
17 Dec 2015: Heroes 5.5 update, 1.6 out for H7 - read more
23 Nov 2015: H7 1.4 & 1.5 patches Released - read more
31 Oct 2015: First H7 patches are out, End of DoC development - read more
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
[X] Remove Ads
LOGIN:     Username:     Password:         [ Register ]
HOMM1: info forum | HOMM2: info forum | HOMM3: info mods forum | HOMM4: info CTG forum | HOMM5: info mods forum | MMH6: wiki forum | MMH7: wiki forum
Heroes Community > Other Side of the Monitor > Thread: Believing in privacy rights... if convenient
Thread: Believing in privacy rights... if convenient This thread is 17 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 · «PREV / NEXT»
blizzardboy
blizzardboy


Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Nerf Herder
posted August 28, 2010 05:31 AM
Edited by blizzardboy at 05:37, 28 Aug 2010.

@El:

People that are exceptionally aggravated with modern affairs are the most likely to watch the news. FOX is soaring right now because there is a democrat president and democrat-majority Congress. The so-called liberal outlets were more popular while Bush was in office for the same reason.

The Iman for this mosque is a despised figure among jingoists such as yourself because he convicts your guilty stances. "The United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than Al Qaeda has on its hands of innocent non-Muslims" is an accurate statement, but because you dislike it, you label the Imam as dangerous, even though he at no point praised Al Qaeda or has shown any involvement with them. He is not a criminal. He's just a guy executing his right to talk.

The editorial doesn't really argue anything; it's a whine-piece about the media.
____________
"Folks, I don't trust children. They're here to replace us."

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Binabik
Binabik


Responsible
Legendary Hero
posted August 28, 2010 05:47 AM

Quote:
"The United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than Al Qaeda has on its hands of innocent non-Muslims" is an accurate statement


Agreed

And his statement that the US is partly responsible for 9/11 is also true.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
blizzardboy
blizzardboy


Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Nerf Herder
posted August 28, 2010 05:59 AM
Edited by blizzardboy at 06:13, 28 Aug 2010.

Something that I don't think has been brought up yet, unless I missed it, is that fact that real estate property in Manhattan doesn't just show up at the drop of a hat. Getting a street corner shop can be a big ordeal for any small business owner, and it doesn't get remotely easier when you want to acquire a much larger amount of property. If this mosque were to be required to relocate (which it very likely won't have to), would they be allowed to relocate at a nearby location that is somewhat further from Ground Zero (based upon some arbitrary number for how close a mosque is allowed to be built to Ground Zero before the fearless overweight armchair patriot generals of America are legitimately allowed to start crying about it)? Would they be compensated for it? Because unless they get lucky they won't be able to do that without paying some kind of outrageous price.
____________
"Folks, I don't trust children. They're here to replace us."

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
KaDa
KaDa

Tavern Dweller
posted August 28, 2010 06:03 AM
Edited by KaDa at 06:32, 28 Aug 2010.

What is sad is that non-radical muslims in their despotic/theocratic homelands are bullied by their radical "brothers" into keeping their mouths shut when they try to make a difference towards the west and against the muslim radicals.
Now they tried to make a difference in the nation home to freedom and all that...
Choice of location without prior communication was a mistake, undeniable in hindsight.

Quote:
It is sad that some people are Americaphobic. I have located an article that discusses both Americaphobia and the ground zero mosque.

Quote:
[...]So let’s call it what it is –- jihad. An out-and-out pro-Islamist assault on American values. In a term they might understand, it’s Americaphobia.

And it’s failing miserably.[...]


"Jihad"
A hard-radical prince who wanted to hurt the US govt. called it something that may not get his ass(and beard) burned at home. How convenient for him, that his religion has a word for it and is excusable if you read their scripture by the letter. Dunno why the word "crusade" pops to my mind, think it was an excuse for war, sometimes waged between fellow believers?
OFC, he may be seriously thinking it's a true jihad.

"An out-and-out pro-Islamist assault on American values."
Ooor a prince's grudge-attack against a goverment that in his twisted-warped mind shortened him.
Not the american values, or they could attack nations in Europe as well, which are closer, and in some laws more liberal than most states of America

"And it’s failing miserably."
And in my view, their "jihad" assault was a complete success.
Citizens of the US are monitored everywhere, getting on a plane takes 10 times as much, fear (of terrorirsm) is soaring. That's something suffered by the people.
The goverment suffered something else: due to it's reaction and the war on terrorism afterwards it has alienated several of it's allies, while the approval of the goverment at home was first soaring ("yes, revenge") and after it turned out that soliders die, it costs sh!tloads of money, doesnt really get anywhere, and incidents like Abu-G happen, goverment support at home plumeted almost as badly as international relationships.

Quote:
And even that poll question has more spin than the top in the movie “Inception.” Here it is: “Overall, do you favor or oppose the building of the Muslim community center and mosque near where the World Trade Center stood?" That certainly embraces the media viewpoint – however inaccurate – that it’s more “community center” than mosque.
Dunno why I shouldnt call a multi-purpose building (10+ floors...) by a name that implies that it's a multi-purpose building.
And there are mosques in the region already, even closer to GZ.

Quote:
The unseen hand of journalism manipulating American democracy is no longer unseen
If we are at manipulation already, and you are linking happy maybe I should do that instead of quoting and replying:
A [url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/fox-news-we-report-even-i_b_80698.html]short story[/url] and a [url=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428#]long vid[/url].

But pointing out that Fox is questionable as unbiased media (which is a requirement for saying "The other person/company is biased and we are better"), [url=http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-august-23-2010/the-parent-company-trap]and ofc they are completely unrelated.[/url]
so besides all that, there's also that the mosque/cultural center/salt-rubber-in-the-wound rubs salt in a wound, and maybe a greater distance from GZ would serve better.
Or -as a friend of mine pointed out- maybe they could also help fund the GZ memorial. For that one has no set date when it will be finished and funding isnt clear yet as well. Now that may be something to close a gap.
Unless you say that dirty muslim money is not welcome.
Suppose that would mean american muslims no longer need to pay tax as well, as it's dirty money
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Binabik
Binabik


Responsible
Legendary Hero
posted August 28, 2010 06:33 AM

Blizzard, I sort of addressed that already (page 10). It's somewhat speculation but as near as I can tell the building of the mosque at that location was opportunistic, not a case that they needed a mosque in that vicinity and set out to find some property. The property had been vacant and up for sale for a long time, but with no buyers because the price was apparently too high. The price kept getting lowered until eventually it was low enough to find a buyer. There are a number of facilities in that area, I looked up all of them (if I remember right there are around 8-10 of them within several blocks)

Also, I don't think it's been mentioned that the coat factory is only half the property. The other half is not owned by them and they are looking for a long term lease, but they don't yet have it.

One more thing that I don't think has been brought up regarding the "investigation". Does anyone know if there is actually an investigation? The only thing I know about is that someone people CALLED for an investigation which doesn't mean a damn thing. My guess is that there really is an investigation, which only seems prudent with the amount of money involved. Hell, any time someone makes a 10k cash transaction at a bank it gets reported.

Quote:
What is sad is that non-radical Muslims are bullied by their radical "brothers" at home into keeping their mouths shut when they try to make a difference.


My view is that the Muslims themselves should make much more effort in policing themselves. If they don't want all the negative PR they should get more serious and do something about it.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Keksimaton
Keksimaton


Promising
Supreme Hero
Talk to the hand
posted August 28, 2010 02:49 PM

What do you mean by that, Binabik?

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Elodin
Elodin


Promising
Legendary Hero
Free Thinker
posted August 28, 2010 07:36 PM

Quote:
@El:

People that are exceptionally aggravated with modern affairs are the most likely to watch the news. FOX is soaring right now because there is a democrat president and democrat-majority Congress. The so-called liberal outlets were more popular while Bush was in office for the same reason.



Sorry, but facts don't bear out your false claim. The left wing loon media has been losing audience (and FOX gaining a greater audience share) for quite some time. The American pepole are center right, not loony left and have caught on to the loony leftist media. Of course the loony left media kissing Obama's *** every 30 seconds leftt them somewhat exposed. You would have thought they were Obama's own PR agency during the presidential campaign.

Quote:

The Iman for this mosque is a despised figure among jingoists such as yourself because he convicts your guilty stances. "The United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than Al Qaeda has on its hands of innocent non-Muslims" is an accurate statement, but because you dislike it, you label the Imam as dangerous, even though he at no point praised Al Qaeda or has shown any involvement with them. He is not a criminal. He's just a guy executing his right to talk.



Jingoism is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as "extreme patriotism in the form of aggressive foreign policy".[1] In practice, it refers to the advocation of the use of threats or actual force against other countries in order to safeguard what they perceive as their country's national interests, and colloquially to excessive bias in judging one's own country as superior to others – an extreme type of nationalism

Nah, I'm not a jingoist but you certainly seem to show excessive bias in judging America. Somehow leftists always conclude America is the evil party. They say America had 9/11 coming. That is very much like saying a child who is raped "had it coming" because obviously no one would have raped the child unless he deserved it.  

Nah, the imman saying America is worse than Al'quieda is just Americaphobia and him siding with terrorists. Many on the left and Muslim extremists have a hatred for America in common.

The ground zero cleric does not sepak like a moderate.

Quote:
"Jihad"
A hard-radical prince who wanted to hurt the US govt. called it something that may not get his ass(and beard) burned at home.


No, his jihad is not just against America. He wants to purge Islam of moderates too.

American troops have been fighting side by side with moderate Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan. There are terror attacks against Americans and against moderate Muslim targets.

Quote:
My view is that the Muslims themselves should make much more effort in policing themselves. If they don't want all the negative PR they should get more serious and do something about it.


Yep. If a cleric is a moderate he would speak out against the terrorist group Hamas very strongly insterad of refusing to call HAMAS a terrorist group. He also would not say that Americ was at fault for 9/11 or that Al'Quieda has murdered less innocent Americans that America has murdered less innocent Muslims.

America has shed her blood to defend Muslims on a number of occasions.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Keksimaton
Keksimaton


Promising
Supreme Hero
Talk to the hand
posted August 28, 2010 09:47 PM

Quote:
America has shed her blood to defend Muslims on a number of occasions.
When was that?

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
blizzardboy
blizzardboy


Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Nerf Herder
posted August 28, 2010 10:07 PM
Edited by blizzardboy at 22:22, 28 Aug 2010.

Back in Nam.

These are army planes dropping medical supplies for Muslims:


____________
"Folks, I don't trust children. They're here to replace us."

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Salamandre
Salamandre


Admirable
Omnipresent Hero
Wog refugee
posted August 28, 2010 10:58 PM

Well, Elodin-with his distorted sense of the reality- will retort that Iraq is such place, where americans died for muslim oil freedom. Easy to predict.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Elodin
Elodin


Promising
Legendary Hero
Free Thinker
posted August 28, 2010 11:58 PM

Things your leftist loon pea brained anti-American professors didn't tell you about how America has helped Muslims:

Click to reverse brainwashing

Quote:
Americans have given thousands of their youngest, best and brightest in combat to save Muslims. This provides a number of important counterarguments to anti-American radicals who ground their rhetoric in the religion of Islam.


1. The world recently commemorated the inexcusable 15th anniversary of Srebrenica, where U.N. forces allowed 8,000 Muslim men to be massacred. In the 1995 military intervention in Yugoslavia, the United States lead a NATO military coalition, against the wishes of the United Nations, to rescue a Muslim minority from ethnic extermination by Serbian President Milosevic. The extermination was typified by the U.N.'s failed defense of Muslims at Srebrenica. There was no member of the intervening coalition from a Middle East Islamic nation. Today, that minority enjoys a new sovereign state created for their benefit by the United States -- Kosovo.  


2. The United States, in its first war with the government of Iraq in 1991, liberated the 2.5  million Muslims of Kuwait. Since that time, Kuwait has consequently adopted a greater measure of political freedom, including the right of women to vote. Saddam Hussein was by his own political definitions a secular Baathist dedicated to oppressing and suppressing Muslims in his own country and in Kuwait when he conquered it in 1991. The United States ended his rule of Kuwait and established humanitarian no-fly zones over Northern Iraq and Southern Iraq to protect Muslim dissidents in those regions.  


3. In the second war with the anti-Muslim government of Saddam Hussein, the United States lost more than 4,000 men and women combating former Baathist radicals and al-Qaeda radicals in the country. Even the viciously anti-American Lancet report acknowledged that more than 75% of the civilian deaths in Iraq during the war were directed by anti-American forces against Muslims. The relative peace that has returned to Iraq since 2006 primarily benefits human life in Muslim communities of Iraq.  


4. The Iraq war of 2003 ended the deadliest military rivalry ever fought since the end of World War II -- the Iran/Iraq war. That war, fought during the 1980s, killed more than one million Muslims, utilizing chemical weapons, forced conscription of teenage males, and an array of grotesque inhumanities that never garnered any major "antiwar" movements in Europe or the United States. The ethically pretentious antiwar movement sat on its hands during the epic annihilation which primarily victimized Muslims.


5. Whatever one thinks of the oil trade, it is definitively the largest transfer of wealth in human history from affluent societies to impoverished societies. Since at least 1973, roughly one trillion dollars has been transferred annually from the economies of Japan, the U.S., Europe, and China to the Middle Eastern oil-producing states. In many instances, the United States imposed embargoes in defense of human rights for Muslims in places such as Iran and Iraq -- increasing the cost and limiting the consumption of such imports to the U.S. Many of those oil-producing states have chosen to use that wealth inappropriately, but the oil can hardly be argued to be "stolen" or "imperial American acquisitions."


6. The U.S.-led war in Afghanistan brought to an end the inhumane rule of the Taliban for more than 20 million Muslims who live there. The Taliban constituted one of the most misogynist governments in human history. Delighting in public executions at soccer stadiums where family members were compelled to discharge AK-47s in the skulls of "adulterers," this government murdered Muslim women in order to create its own despicable spectacle of governance by terror. Today, those marginalized and dissident members of the Taliban ride about on motorcycles throwing acid in the faces of liberated schoolgirls across the Afghan countryside in hopes of returning to power.  


7. In 2005, Indonesia, the largest Muslim country in the world, populated by more than 200 million adherents, was struck by a deadly tsunami, which killed more than 150,000 people. The theological center of Islam -- Saudi Arabia -- provided a paltry ten million dollars in aid for victims. But Indonesia was struck by another tsunami soon after: a tidal wave of charitable giving from the U.S. The United States government provided almost one billion dollars in aid. Private charitable giving by private individual Americans provided another $800 million.  


8. More than $370 billion in remittances is provided annually by the United States economy to the world. Many billions of these dollars flow to countries such as Kuwait, Lebanon, and Iran. These funds benefit Muslim communities in these countries. Remittances are funds earned in the United States by family members but sent back to communities in their host country.


9. The United States does provide demonstrable religious freedom unlike any other place in the world. While European governments tightly regulate what is recognized as a legitimate religion, the United States does in fact allow the free exercise of religion -- including millions of Muslims. In sharp contrast, converts from Islam in Muslim nations such as Saudi Arabia face death sentences for a well-known crime called "apostasy."  


10. The U.S. war on terrorism destroys radicals who have as their first and most significant victims Muslims who disagree with their violent supremacist interpretations of Islam. When young girls are murdered by these radicals all around the world in the form of "honor" killings, it is rarely non-Muslims who are killed. These are Muslim women dying at the hands of these bizarre misogynists. The terrorists disproportionately kill Muslims. This is why in Iraq, hatred of al-Qaeda is higher than it is in the United States. Iraqis witness on a daily basis the peculiar logic of bombings targeted at marketplaces where Muslims shop with their families. It is practices like these that are turning Muslims against groups such as al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, and Hamas.    

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
blizzardboy
blizzardboy


Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Nerf Herder
posted August 29, 2010 12:56 AM

The only armed intervention in that list that was, within limits, justified is Afghanistan. The other interventions were all unwarranted and did a lot of harm, both to the country in question and to the States.

Giving federally-funded foreign aid is dumb. The private aid to Indonesia was nice, but that's unrelated.

The argument that the US and other developed countries have helped Muslims by buying their oil is silly. Technically yes they have, but they economically don't have much of a choice. You're not being noble by commencing in a mutually beneficial exchange, you're merely doing business.


____________
"Folks, I don't trust children. They're here to replace us."

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
bixie
bixie


Promising
Legendary Hero
my common sense is tingling!
posted August 31, 2010 09:24 AM

you guys do know that there is a relation between this mosque and terrorist recruitment.

Taliban public relations (yeah, ironic, eh), have said that the prevention of the muslim centres construction is actually doing more to help their recruitment than the banning of the burka in france. because moderate muslims see the opposition to it and think "Well, I'm not welcome here."

so appart from the tortures and confinement within Qitmo, and the bombing of women and children, and the lack of help for those dying in the pakistan flood, america is simply feeding the terrorist recruitment. Al-queda are like the reality trolls, constantly pissing off america going "wadda gonna do, wadda gonna do!"

by trying to stop the mosque being built, you expose america for even more chances to be hurt by possibly more devastating attacks in the future, and the more people protest it, the more moderate muslims decide that since they are not wanted in the west, then they should go where they can actually practice their faith without being persecuted for it.


____________
Love, Laugh, Learn, Live.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Binabik
Binabik


Responsible
Legendary Hero
posted August 31, 2010 09:47 AM

Quote:
Well, I'm not welcome here


They're not.

And who gives a crap what Al-Quida thinks. Screw 'em.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
bixie
bixie


Promising
Legendary Hero
my common sense is tingling!
posted August 31, 2010 10:09 AM

it's not what they think, it's actually happening.

think about it, the more you loose moderates, the more this conflict will be stretched out, and more likely will become more bloody, and end horrifically on both sides.

the west is not at war with islam, we repeatedly keep saying, but if we don't allow this mosque to be built, and the more we protest it, the more it actually fuels the terrorist engine we are trying to dismantle. we are feeding our own demise, like sawing the branch we are sitting on, admient that the branch will cause offense.
____________
Love, Laugh, Learn, Live.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
JollyJoker
JollyJoker


Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
posted August 31, 2010 10:28 AM

Quote:
Quote:
Well, I'm not welcome here


They're not.

And who gives a crap what Al-Quida thinks. Screw 'em.


Uh oh. The constitution says otherwise. Aren't the US of A supposed to be the land of religious freedom?

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Binabik
Binabik


Responsible
Legendary Hero
posted August 31, 2010 10:31 AM

I don't think it's a case of losing moderates. I think it's a case of them coming out of the closet.

If they want to be accepted into a society, then they have to learn to be civil. And that means what they do and say behind closed doors as well as the face they show in public.

They can do whatever the hell they want in their own country. But when they move to another country they need to obey the rules. That means both the written law and the norms of society.

People just don't seem to get that this thing with the mosque is NOT a legal issue or a constitutional issue, it's a SOCIAL issue. I suppose that one way of looking at it is that it's rude as hell. It's like going to someone's funeral and start insulting the deceased, then making some claim of freedom of speech. It doesn't have a thing to do with freedom of speech. It's about a SOCIAL issue and those kinds of actions aren't acceptable.

When you enter a building and there is an elderly couple three steps behind you, there is no law that says you have to hold the door open for them. You simply do it because to not do so is very rude and disrespectful. It's a very simple concept.

Anyway, off to bed.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Binabik
Binabik


Responsible
Legendary Hero
posted August 31, 2010 10:37 AM

Quote:
Uh oh. The constitution says otherwise. Aren't the US of A supposed to be the land of religious freedom?


It's a land where if people don't want to follow the rules they can leave. There is nothing in the Constitution saying that they have to be allowed to enter the country. There is also nothing in the Constitution that says that once they are here they can break the rules. If they don't follow the rules, either written statutes or societal norms, no they aren't welcome. Freedom of religion does not give any protection against that.

OK, one last time, off to bed.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
bixie
bixie


Promising
Legendary Hero
my common sense is tingling!
posted August 31, 2010 10:47 AM

and what would civil be to you, Binabik? give up islam?

this is under the assumption that all muslims are from another country. actually, no, most of the people who are supporting this cultural centre, and are most likely to be swayed by the incredibly negative reaction to it, are american-born muslims. most of them have spent all their lives on american soil, and this kind of "Well, if their muslim, we should send them back to where they came from" smacks of A) too much fox news and B) blatant intolerance on your part, and I know you are alot better than that.

about the funeral, yes, it would be very disrespectful to do something like this when the people are actually being put in the ground. yes, to take a dump on the coffin would be stupid and rude and disrespectful. but this is ten years after it, nowhere near where any of them died (landing gear is not a person) and is rolling over so as not to creat a controversy.

It's common decency not to picket, bully and marginalise your fellow citizens because of their religion, and not to stereotype them with obvious extremists. It's common decency not to cordon off areas of the country and say "nobody who belongs to religion X can go there, it's hallowed ground," when people of Religion X experienced just as much loss and suffering from the events at that hallowed ground. It's common decency not to stab your cab driver because he's muslim, saying "this is your check point." but stuff like that happens, and we all have to f**king deal with it.

you might be offended by the cultural centre. Good, Be offended, it doesn't stop them from having the right to do it. And if we are governed by what is socially acceptable, we can all to quickly descend into mob rule, and nobody wants that.

____________
Love, Laugh, Learn, Live.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Corribus
Corribus

Hero of Order
The Abyss Staring Back at You
posted August 31, 2010 03:36 PM

Quote:
and what would civil be to you, Binabik? give up islam?

Come on, bixie, what Bin is saying really isn't that complicated.

Quote:
about the funeral, yes, it would be very disrespectful to do something like this when the people are actually being put in the ground. yes, to take a dump on the coffin would be stupid and rude and disrespectful. but this is ten years after it, nowhere near where any of them died (landing gear is not a person) and is rolling over so as not to creat a controversy.

It's been over half a century since World War II.  Would it be acceptible for me to go to Arlington Cemetary and spit on the graves of US soldiers who perished in that conflict over in Europe?  After all, it's been well over 10 years and Arlington is nowhere near the beaches of Normandy.  

Since when did we put limits of space or time on honor and respect.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Jump To: « Prev Thread . . . Next Thread » This thread is 17 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 · «PREV / NEXT»
Post New Poll    Post New Topic    Post New Reply

Page compiled in 0.0971 seconds