|
|
Doomforge
Admirable
Undefeatable Hero
Retired Hero
|
posted January 03, 2009 09:28 PM |
|
|
Hey, I grew out of it already 
____________
We reached to the stars and everything is now ours
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 09:32 PM |
|
|
Quote:
Sorry, but cooking for me is not something I expect from a potential girlfriend  Still, I really appreciate EVERY attempt she could do to impress me, even though the results may vary. In such case, intentions is what matters.
That's what "naturally" they are supposed to do mate (I mean cooking). Well at least, girls are always more family oriented and I should say, a bit more mature on the 'impress' than guys (except geeks, which usually 'impress' by not even wanting). Girls also usually (i.e are more inclined than men) look forward to more mature stuff in a relationship. Overall no surprise people say women are more mature. (although it would be an offense to me since I'm not the usual stupid male stereotype -- includes drinking, being macho, and all that )
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
Doomforge
Admirable
Undefeatable Hero
Retired Hero
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 09:42 PM |
|
|
Quote:
Girls also usually (i.e are more inclined than men) look forward to more mature stuff in a relationship.
No way. Of all the girls I dated, most were concerned about extremely trivial matters. Maybe it works like that above the age of 21, since I haven't dated older women. Still, ugh. I was like 20 years ahead in every relationship, in terms of age. And I don't consider myself stiff, really
____________
We reached to the stars and everything is now ours
|
|
mvassilev
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 09:51 PM |
|
|
Quote:
And I don't consider myself stiff, really
It only matters if the girl says you're not.
Argh, my mind...
____________
Eccentric Opinion
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 10:13 PM |
|
|
Quote:
No way. Of all the girls I dated, most were concerned about extremely trivial matters. Maybe it works like that above the age of 21, since I haven't dated older women. Still, ugh. I was like 20 years ahead in every relationship, in terms of age. And I don't consider myself stiff, really
Trust me, you're not the "average" type of guy
not sure if it makes you feel any better, it would make me though.
There are always exceptions to the rule. I said just what I read from articles and their statistics, I know most aren't reliable (it was on Yahoo news so yeah ).
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
Doomforge
Admirable
Undefeatable Hero
Retired Hero
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 10:23 PM |
|
|
Well, thanks  I'd prefer to be average myself, tho. Less requirements. Less doubts. More fun. Easier life. That's at least what I think when watching "average" people. They simply don't care for many things I care for.
I think they are way happier than me. Oh, and better. Seriously. They at least don't scheme those petty schemes, put labels on people and try to act superior.. I myself try not to, but it's sometimes too hard.
I wish I was a simple, mundane person. Not that I'm great and so on, but, well, I just care for too many things.
____________
We reached to the stars and everything is now ours
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 10:30 PM |
|
|
Well sometimes it may feel bad to be 'weird' (as in not average), but I always remember the good things about it and how bad I would have turned if I weren't (blessed? I dunno) with that.
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
kipshasz
Undefeatable Hero
Elvin's Darkside
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 10:34 PM |
|
|
Doomforge, you should really try to date older women. Not to old, just 2-4 years older than you will do. My bro's girlfriend is 4 years older than him. And God damn me they are a perfect couple. Sometimes i start to think that they are illegally married 
____________
"Kip is the Gavin McInnes of HC" - Salamandre
"Ashan to the Trashcan", "I got PTSD from H7. " - LizardWarrior
|
|
Doomforge
Admirable
Undefeatable Hero
Retired Hero
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 10:39 PM |
|
|
That would be nice, but I'm not physically interested in older women.
____________
We reached to the stars and everything is now ours
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 11:50 PM |
|
|
Quote:
TheDeath:
Again, you are exactly right.
No, he's exactly wrong. Again. As you are.
If you forbid something that you find ONLY with women, it's sexist: Would WOMEN forbid something THEY had? So WHO WOULD forbid it? Men ONLY. Therefore: sexist.
Or does someone think if women only had a third eye, WOMEN would forbid (using) it?
It's really incredible, what nonsensical constructs are brought up to prove that sexism is no sexism but common sense.
The Death, after all I read from you these last months, don't you think it's strange that Mvass agrees with you?
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted January 03, 2009 11:58 PM |
|
Edited by TheDeath at 00:00, 04 Jan 2009.
|
Quote:
The Death, after all I read from you these last months, don't you think it's strange that Mvass agrees with you?
I don't know, but I think you misinterpreted what I said. (not sure if mvass did)
Men don't forbid the third eye because they "envy" women (not to mention though, that the third eye already makes them 'different' and 'unequal' and they can brag about it, but let's ignore that). Men forbid it because of its effects or whatever. What if we go to the other example, where all women had machine gun arms? Or simpler put, knives instead of arms?
Now, knives and guns are available to everyone by purchase. Doesn't mean you have to legalize them though. Even if it's for EVERYONE (by purchase). Similarly, banning it for women isn't because they are women (in this example), but because said thing was dangerous. No matter if women or men have it (men = by carrying it, by purchasing, etc...)
Of course now, what is in this thread isn't "dangerous" by any margin, but I had to emphasize it so as to avoid another "you don't make any sense" reply.
You can call my analogies crappy if you find them that way -- at least it's better than saying I don't make any sense.
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
del_diablo
Legendary Hero
Manifest
|
|
posted January 04, 2009 12:18 AM |
|
|
Quote:
Now, knives and guns are available to everyone by purchase. Doesn't mean you have to legalize them though. Even if it's for EVERYONE (by purchase). Similarly, banning it for women isn't because they are women (in this example), but because said thing was dangerous. No matter if women or men have it (men = by carrying it, by purchasing, etc...)
Lets say women had a 3rd arm or claw arms or someting, why ban them? It would be worse than Muslims and circumcision(if you DO get the reffereance)!
It should be illegal to ue them to kill things if its claws, but that does also applie to hands.
Abusing heavly should be banned, not forbidden to have them.
And it should be equally banned if thats the case.
____________
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted January 04, 2009 12:20 AM |
|
|
Only that (because the analogy was kinda crappy and not on the point), they do "use" them otherwise...
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
mvassilev
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted January 04, 2009 12:34 AM |
|
|
What if women had a blinker on top of their heads that would flash every couple of seconds? I think they'd be asked to cover that blinker up in public. And rightly so.
____________
Eccentric Opinion
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted January 04, 2009 09:45 AM |
|
|
WHO would ask them? Other women?
Now, actually it's already strange that we are talking about forbidding something for WOMEN.
Let's say MEN had a third arm - very strong, very effective... You can't really think they would forbid it, don't you?
And face it, if MEN hat that blinker on their head, it would be all about who had the brightest and the guys would flash it around, proudly.
I really love cats, and I love the way, how their tail becomes thick and bushy when they are angry. I used to think about what if humans still had their tails and what a cult their would be made about it. Education would include controlling the reactions of it or even faking a convenient reaction, and of course it would involve a lot of crappy style nonsense.
However, what about if only ONE gender had a tail left...
Would you like THE OTHER gender tell you how to proceed with it? How it was indecent to show it in public? How it was gross to get a bushy tail?
I don't think so.
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted January 04, 2009 04:11 PM |
|
|
Quote:
WHO would ask them? Other women?
What if that blinking was a danger to traffic, for example, and distracted drivers and made them have accidents?
Of course, I'm going extreme, just to make the point -- I know the analogy is off.
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted January 04, 2009 05:14 PM |
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
WHO would ask them? Other women?
What if that blinking was a danger to traffic, for example, and distracted drivers and made them have accidents?
Nothing. As far as I know blinking neon advertsement signs are allowed, no matter the dangers to traffic.
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted January 04, 2009 05:29 PM |
|
|
Doesn't mean they should be. Further, what if someone with epileptic conditions suffers from that blinking? Still ignore it like it never happened and it's not her fault? (much less extreme)
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
mvassilev
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted January 04, 2009 05:30 PM |
|
|
There was some case in the US some time ago where the Supreme Court ruled that pornographic content should not be visible from the road. A hazard.
____________
Eccentric Opinion
|
|
JollyJoker
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted January 04, 2009 05:48 PM |
|
|
You should know the definition of pornographic, shouldn't you.
And, TheDeath, your arguing is leading to nothing. You grab for straws, coming from this to that, arguing for arguing's sake.
|
|
|
|
This thread is pages long: 
